How to Find Someone’s Court Records: PACER, State Electronic Court Systems, and County Clerk Searches
U.S. court records operate through layered federal, state, and county systems. PACER provides federal court records (district courts, bankruptcy courts, appellate courts) with paid public access. State electronic court systems vary by jurisdiction — Texas (re:SearchTX), Florida (CCIS, MyFloridaCourtsAccess), California (Court Reservation System), and others provide robust online access. County clerk searches handle most state-court matters with county-by-county system variation.
U.S. court records operate through three layers paralleling the broader corrections and legal systems. Federal court records (district courts handling federal civil and criminal cases, bankruptcy courts, appellate courts) are accessed primarily through PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). State court records (state-level civil, criminal, family, and probate cases) are accessed through state electronic court systems with substantial variation in coverage and capabilities. County court records (most state-court matters are filed at the county level) are accessed through county clerk online portals and direct clerk inquiries.
The investigation methodology varies by court tier and case type. PACER provides comprehensive federal court access with paid downloads and free docket browsing. State electronic systems vary from comprehensive (Texas re:SearchTX, Florida CCIS) to limited (some states have minimal online access for older cases). County clerk systems vary by county technology and policy. Civil cases, criminal cases, family law cases, and probate cases each have different access patterns and proper-purpose framework considerations.
Practitioners search for court records for many legitimate purposes: due diligence in business transactions; litigation preparation requiring background research on opposing parties or witnesses; debt collection involving prior judgment research; FCRA-regulated background checks for employment, tenancy, credit, and insurance purposes; journalism covering legal proceedings; family research in genealogy and estate matters; and personal record-keeping by parties to past proceedings. Each purpose has specific framework considerations including FCRA when the search supports a consumer report.
📺 In this video
💡 Three tiers, three search systems
Federal cases (district courts, bankruptcy courts, appellate courts): PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ — paid public access with $0.10/page after $30 quarterly threshold. State cases (state-level civil, criminal, family): state-specific electronic systems with substantial variation — Texas re:SearchTX (https://www.research.txcourts.gov/) is among the most comprehensive; California uses court-by-court reservation systems. County cases: county clerk online portals or direct clerk inquiries with county-by-county variation. Identify the relevant tier first; the search methodology follows from the tier.
Need professional court records research?
Multi-tier court record research integrated with comprehensive subject background. PACER, state systems, and county searches under appropriate FCRA-permitted-purpose framework — delivered in 5–7 business days.
Federal court records through Public Access to Court Electronic Records
PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ provides public access to federal court records across all federal district courts, bankruptcy courts, and appellate courts. The system supports name-based searches, case-number searches, and various advanced search options. Document downloads cost $0.10 per page with a $30 quarterly threshold (charges below $30 per quarter are waived). Docket browsing without document downloads is free.
Court coverage
PACER covers all federal district courts (94 districts, handling federal civil and criminal cases at the trial level), all federal bankruptcy courts (90 districts, handling federal bankruptcy proceedings), and federal appellate courts (13 circuits, handling federal appellate review). The coverage is comprehensive across the federal court system. Some specialized federal courts (Tax Court, Court of Federal Claims, Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims) have separate electronic record systems with different access procedures.
Search methodologies
PACER supports several search approaches: (1) the unified PACER Case Locator (PCL) at https://pcl.uscourts.gov/ supporting cross-court name-based searches; (2) court-specific CM/ECF systems supporting detailed searches within specific courts; (3) advanced search options including date ranges, case types, and party-role filtering. The PCL is appropriate for general name-based searches when the relevant court is unknown; court-specific searches are more efficient when the case court is known.
Common federal record types
Federal court records include: civil case records (federal civil litigation under federal subject matter jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction); criminal case records (federal criminal prosecutions); bankruptcy case records (Chapter 7, 11, 12, 13 filings and proceedings); appellate records (appeals to federal circuit courts and certiorari proceedings); and various specialized federal proceedings. Each record type has specific access patterns within the PACER framework.
PACER cost management
PACER charges $0.10 per page for document downloads with $30 quarterly threshold. The threshold means most light-volume users pay nothing; heavier-volume practitioners pay only for usage above the threshold. Cost management for portfolio-scale research includes: filtering searches to relevant cases before downloading documents; using free docket browsing for case identification before paid document review; using PACER fee waivers available for indigent litigants and certain non-commercial researchers.
State electronic court records by jurisdiction
State court electronic records systems vary substantially in coverage and capabilities. Some states have comprehensive state-wide electronic systems supporting cross-county searches. Others delegate electronic records to county-level systems with substantial county-by-county variation. The state-specific framework determines the appropriate research methodology.
Texas re:SearchTX
Texas operates re:SearchTX (https://www.research.txcourts.gov/) providing comprehensive cross-county court records access for participating Texas courts. The system supports name-based searches across the participating counties, document image access, and various advanced search options. Coverage is comprehensive but not universal — some Texas counties have not yet integrated with re:SearchTX. The Office of Court Administration maintains the system and adds counties periodically.
Florida county-based systems
Florida has not centralized state-wide; the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal coordinates filing but case-record access is generally county-by-county. Major-county systems include Miami-Dade Clerk of Court, Broward County Clerk, Hillsborough County Clerk, Orange County Comptroller, Duval County Clerk, and others. Each major county has comprehensive online court record access; smaller counties may have more limited systems.
California court-by-court systems
California has not centralized state-wide; each California superior court operates its own electronic records system. Major-county systems include Los Angeles Superior Court, San Francisco Superior Court, Santa Clara Superior Court, Orange County Superior Court, San Diego Superior Court, and others. Each system has its own search interface and coverage parameters. State-wide name searches require multiple county-level searches.
New York unified e-courts
New York operates the Unified Court System with WebCriminal, eCourts CivilSupreme, and other state-wide search systems supporting various court-record categories. The state-wide systems cover criminal and civil supreme court matters; family court and surrogate court records have separate access procedures. Coverage is comprehensive for the systems that exist.
Other major-state systems
Illinois (Cook County and other major counties have comprehensive systems), Pennsylvania (PA Courts Web Docket), Ohio (county-by-county systems), Michigan (one court system but county-by-county for many record types), Georgia (Georgia Court Records search portal), and other states have varying levels of state-wide vs. county-level electronic records access. Practitioners with multi-state caseloads should familiarize themselves with each relevant state’s specific system.
County-level court record access
Most state-court cases are filed at the county level. County clerks (or court clerks for the relevant level court) maintain the case records. Many counties have online court record search systems; others require direct clerk contact for record verification or copies. The county-by-county variation is substantial.
For counties with online court record systems, the typical capabilities include name-based and case-number searches, party-role filtering (plaintiff, defendant, attorney), date-range searching, and document download for digitized records. Older paper records may not be digitized and may require direct clerk contact for retrieval. The cost of county clerk record copies varies widely from free downloads to per-page charges.
For counties without online systems, the methodology requires direct clerk contact. The typical procedure: identify the relevant county based on subject’s known activity area or case-related information; contact the county court clerk’s office; request record search with proper subject identification (full name, date of birth helpful, case number when known); pay applicable search fees and copy charges. Some counties handle inquiries by phone, mail, or in-person; some require written requests with payment.
Civil, criminal, family, probate, and bankruptcy records
Court records span several major categories with different access patterns and FCRA implications.
Civil records
Civil court records cover lawsuits between private parties and governmental entities not involving criminal charges. Common civil case types: contract disputes, torts (personal injury, defamation), property disputes, employment disputes, professional malpractice. Civil records typically include: case caption, parties, attorney information, docket entries, filed documents, judgments, and case status. Civil records are typically accessible without subject consent for legitimate research purposes; FCRA applies when used in consumer reports.
Criminal records
Criminal court records cover prosecutions for criminal offenses. Records include: arrest information, charges, plea status, conviction details, sentence, and appeal status. Criminal records access is typically more restricted than civil records — some jurisdictions limit access to specific record categories or require permitted-purpose justification. FCRA framework applies for criminal records used in consumer reports including FCRA §1681c(a)(2) lookback period restrictions for non-conviction information.
Family law records
Family law records include divorce, custody, child support, paternity, and adoption proceedings. Access is typically more restricted than civil or criminal records — many jurisdictions limit family law record access to parties, attorneys, and specifically authorized researchers. Sealed family law records (common in adoption matters and some custody disputes) are not publicly accessible.
Probate records
Probate records include estate proceedings (administering deceased persons’ estates), guardianship proceedings (for incapacitated persons), and conservatorship proceedings. Probate records are typically publicly accessible because the probate process is fundamentally about creditor and beneficiary notice — public access supports the notice function. Probate records often contain valuable financial information including asset inventories, debts, beneficiary information, and family relationships.
Bankruptcy records
Federal bankruptcy court records (Chapter 7, 11, 12, 13) are accessible through PACER. Bankruptcy records contain detailed financial information including assets, debts, schedules, statements of financial affairs, and proceedings. The records are publicly accessible because bankruptcy is a public proceeding involving creditor rights and notice. FCRA framework includes specific bankruptcy lookback provisions — bankruptcy filings appear in consumer reports for 10 years from filing under FCRA §1681c.
Records that have been removed from public access
Many jurisdictions allow expungement or sealing of certain court records under various circumstances. Expungement typically removes records from public access more comprehensively than sealing. Common expungement contexts: arrests not resulting in conviction (in many jurisdictions); juvenile records (age-based or rehabilitation-based expungement); first-offender programs producing dismissal upon completion; specific offense categories under state-specific expungement statutes.
Practitioners conducting court record searches should understand that complete record absence does not necessarily mean the subject has no record history — the absence may reflect successful expungement or sealing. Conversely, the absence often does mean no record history. The investigation should not assume expungement when records are not found; appropriate verification through other sources may be necessary for high-stakes purposes.
FCRA framework includes specific lookback provisions for criminal records used in consumer reports. FCRA §1681c(a)(2) prohibits reporting arrest records older than 7 years (with various state-specific exceptions and modifications). Convictions are reportable indefinitely but state-specific ‘ban-the-box’ laws and similar protections may limit consideration in employment and other decisions. Professional FCRA-compliant background check services integrate court records with appropriate lookback compliance.
Common court record search scenarios
Court record searches arise in several common practitioner scenarios with specific methodology recommendations.
Litigation due diligence
Litigation preparation often includes background research on opposing parties, key witnesses, and other case-relevant individuals. The methodology: PACER for federal court history; state e-filing systems for state-court history; county clerk searches for county-level cases. Multi-jurisdiction searches across all known activity areas produce a comprehensive picture of the subject’s litigation history.
Business transaction due diligence
Business acquisitions, partnerships, and significant transactions often include due diligence on counterparties. Court record searches identify pending or prior litigation, judgments, regulatory enforcement, and other risk indicators. The methodology integrates with broader due diligence research including UCC filings, regulatory filings, and credit reporting.
Employment background checks
FCRA-regulated employment background checks include court record searches with specific framework requirements. Subject disclosure, written consent, lookback compliance under FCRA §1681c, dispute procedures under FCRA §1681i, and adverse action procedures all apply. Professional FCRA-compliant background check services structure the research and reporting to meet the framework requirements.
Genealogy and estate research
Genealogical research and estate administration often include probate record searches. Probate records identify estate proceedings, beneficiaries, asset distributions, and family relationships. The records support both genealogical research (identifying family connections) and estate administration (identifying potential heirs, claims, and asset distributions).
Integrating court records with other investigation
Court records integration with other investigation methodology produces comprehensive subject profiles supporting various practitioner contexts. The integration combines court records with conviction history, civil litigation history, public records, and various other investigation streams.
Multi-jurisdictional integration
Comprehensive court-record investigation crosses multiple jurisdictions: federal courts (PACER); state courts (state-by-state systems); county courts (county-by-county systems); specialized courts (probate, family, juvenile where applicable). Multi-jurisdictional methodology develops complete court-record profile across all jurisdictions where subject has had court involvement. Subjects with multi-state residence history require investigation across all relevant jurisdictions; integrated case management supports the multi-jurisdictional methodology.
Civil and criminal integration
Court records investigation typically integrates civil and criminal records: civil litigation history showing financial disputes, business disputes, family law matters, various others; criminal records showing convictions, dispositions, current status; specialized records (probate, family, juvenile) producing additional context. The integrated approach produces comprehensive subject profile beyond any single record category.
Public records cross-reference
Court records integration with broader public records produces comprehensive subject investigation: real property records (county recorder/assessor); business filings (Secretary of State); UCC filings; professional licensing; voter registration; and various other public records. Cross-reference identifies inconsistencies, undisclosed assets, undisclosed activities, and various other investigation leads. Public records cross-reference is particularly valuable for civil litigation, asset discovery, and comprehensive background investigation.
Common questions
How do I find someone’s court records?
Use PACER (https://pacer.uscourts.gov/) for federal court records; state electronic court systems (Texas re:SearchTX, Florida county-based systems, California court-by-court systems, New York unified e-courts) for state-court records; county clerk online systems or direct clerk contact for county-level records. Identify the relevant court tier first; the search methodology follows from the tier.
What is PACER?
PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ provides public access to federal court records across all federal district courts (94), bankruptcy courts (90), and appellate courts (13). Document downloads cost $0.10 per page with a $30 quarterly threshold. Docket browsing without document downloads is free.
Are court records public?
Generally yes, with significant exceptions. Civil and criminal records are typically publicly accessible. Family law and adoption records are often sealed or restricted. Sealed records (sealed indictments, sealed civil records, juvenile records) are not publicly accessible. Expunged records have been removed from public access entirely in most jurisdictions.
Can I see federal sealed indictments?
Generally not until unsealing. Federal indictments are often sealed initially to protect ongoing investigations or witness safety. Sealed indictments become accessible through PACER when unsealed — typically when the subject is in custody. Some sealed indictments remain sealed indefinitely for ongoing investigation reasons.
How do I search Texas court records?
Texas operates re:SearchTX (https://www.research.txcourts.gov/) providing cross-county court records access for participating Texas courts. Coverage is comprehensive across major counties. Smaller counties may have separate clerk systems requiring direct contact.
How do I search California court records?
California has not centralized state-wide; each superior court operates its own electronic records system. Major-county systems include LA Superior, SF Superior, Santa Clara Superior, Orange County Superior, San Diego Superior. State-wide name searches require multiple county-level searches across all relevant counties.
What about Florida court records?
Florida has not centralized state-wide; case-record access is generally county-by-county through county clerk systems. Major counties (Miami-Dade, Broward, Hillsborough, Orange, Duval) have comprehensive online systems; smaller counties may have more limited systems.
Can criminal records be reported in background checks?
Yes, with FCRA framework restrictions. FCRA §1681c(a)(2) prohibits reporting arrest records older than 7 years (with state-specific exceptions). Convictions are reportable indefinitely but state-specific ‘ban-the-box’ laws may limit consideration in employment and other decisions. Professional FCRA-compliant background check services integrate compliance procedures.
What is expungement?
Expungement is a legal procedure removing records from public access — typically more comprehensive than sealing. Common expungement contexts include arrests not resulting in conviction, juvenile records, first-offender program completion, and specific offense categories under state-specific expungement statutes. Expunged records generally cannot be reported in background checks or consumer reports.
How long do court records remain public?
Generally indefinitely unless expunged or sealed. Federal court records under PACER coverage extend to historical cases (varying by court and case type). State court records vary by jurisdiction retention policies. FCRA reporting limits on consumer report content (7 years for arrests not resulting in conviction; 10 years for bankruptcies; indefinite for convictions) are separate from the underlying record availability.
Ready for comprehensive court record research?
Professional court record research integrating PACER federal records, state electronic systems, and county clerk searches under FCRA-compliant permitted-purpose framework. Litigation due diligence, employment screening, and broader background investigation applications.
Reviewed by People Locator Skip Tracing Investigation Team
Established 2004 · 20+ Years Experience · FCRA · GLBA · DPPA Compliant
A professional skip tracing service trusted by attorneys, process servers, and debt collectors since 2004.
Legal Disclaimer. People Locator Skip Tracing provides investigative services for lawful purposes only. Court record access supports legitimate due diligence, litigation preparation, FCRA-compliant background checks, and journalistic and family research purposes. This page is informational and not legal advice; FCRA-regulated background reporting requires compliance with disclosure, consent, dispute, and adverse-action procedures.
© 2026 People Locator Skip Tracing® — All rights reserved.
