โš– Creditor’s Complete Guide โ€ข Updated 2026

Wage Garnishment Laws by State โ€” All 52 U.S. Jurisdictions

Compare wage garnishment formulas, maximum percentages, weekly floors, and judgment lifespans across all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Every jurisdiction’s primary statute, distinctive features, and creditor strategy in one place.

Wage Garnishment Laws by State video overview

Watch Overview


52

U.S. jurisdictions covered

4

States prohibit consumer garnishment

25%

Federal CCPA maximum

$702

Highest weekly floor (DC)

How Wage Garnishment Varies Across the United States

Wage garnishment in the United States is governed by a patchwork of federal and state laws. The federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. ยง1673) establishes a national ceiling: the greater of 25% of disposable earnings or amounts above 30 times the federal minimum wage may be garnished โ€” but states are free to be more debtor-favorable, and most are.

Four U.S. states (Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and South Carolina) plus Puerto Rico prohibit wage garnishment for consumer debt entirely. About a dozen states impose lower percentage caps than the federal 25% โ€” ranging from 10% (New Jersey for low-income debtors) to 20% (Wisconsin, West Virginia, South Dakota, Colorado, Washington). Other states use higher weekly floors based on state minimum wage multipliers (40ร—, 45ร—, or even 50ร—) rather than the federal 30ร—, producing substantially higher protected amounts in high-minimum-wage states.

This index links to every U.S. jurisdiction’s complete wage garnishment guide, organized by region. Each state-specific page covers the primary statute, garnishment formula, weekly floor, judgment lifespan, recent legislative changes, procedural mechanics, employer obligations, exemption claim processes, support order priority, and creditor strategy.

โš– Why Jurisdiction Matters for Creditors

Two debtors earning the same $1,200/week disposable income can produce dramatically different garnishment outcomes based on where they work. In Texas or Pennsylvania: $0 garnishable for consumer debt. In Massachusetts (15% / 50ร— state min): roughly $67.50/week. In federal CCPA states (25% / 30ร— federal min): the full $300/week (25%). In DC (25% / 40ร— DC min of $17.50): approximately $497.60/week limited by the floor analysis. Locating the employer’s actual jurisdiction is the threshold question for every wage garnishment effort.

Wage Garnishment Laws by Region

Click any jurisdiction below for the complete creditor’s guide, including statutory framework, garnishment formula, exemption procedures, employer obligations, and recent legislative changes.

West

California

20% / 40% ร— 48ร— state minwage formula (CCP ยง706.050)

Oregon

ORS ยง18.385 โ€” 25% federal CCPA OR 75% protected (lesser garnishment)

Washington

RCW ยง6.27.150 โ€” 20% / 35ร— state minimum wage

Nevada

NRS ยง31.295 โ€” 25% / 50ร— federal minimum wage

Arizona

A.R.S. ยง33-1131 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage (10% on showing)

New Mexico

NMSA ยง35-12-7 โ€” 25% / 40ร— federal minimum wage

Utah

Utah Code ยง70C-7-103 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Idaho

Idaho Code ยง11-207 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Montana

Mont. Code ยง25-13-614 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Wyoming

Wyo. Stat. ยง1-15-509 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Colorado

C.R.S. ยง13-54-104 โ€” 20% / 40ร— state minimum wage

Alaska

AS ยง09.38.030 โ€” 25% / 1.25ร— federal poverty line

Hawaii

HRS ยง652-1 โ€” 5% first $100 / 10% next $100 / 25% over $200

Midwest / Plains

Ohio

Ohio Rev. Code ยง2716.02 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Michigan

MCL ยง600.4012 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Indiana

Ind. Code ยง24-4.5-5-105 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Illinois

735 ILCS 5/12-803 โ€” 15% gross / 45ร— state minimum wage

Wisconsin

Wis. Stat. ยง812.34 โ€” 20% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Minnesota

Minn. Stat. ยง571.922 โ€” 25% / 40ร— state or federal minimum wage (greater)

Iowa

Iowa Code ยง642.21 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Kansas

K.S.A. ยง60-2310 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Missouri

Mo. Rev. Stat. ยง525.030 โ€” 25% federal CCPA (10% for head-of-family)

Nebraska

Neb. Rev. Stat. ยง25-1558 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage (15% head of family)

North Dakota

N.D. Cent. Code ยง32-09.1-03 โ€” 25% / 40ร— federal minimum wage + dependents

South Dakota

S.D. Codified Laws ยง21-18-51 โ€” 20% / 40ร— federal minimum wage

South / Southeast

Texas

Tex. Const. Art. XVI ยง28; Tex. Prop. Code ยง42.001 โ€” PROHIBITED for consumer debt (constitutional bar

Oklahoma

12 O.S. ยง1170.2 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Arkansas

Ark. Code ยง16-110-401 et seq. โ€” 25% federal CCPA (with laborers/mechanics protection)

Louisiana

La. R.S. ยง13:3881 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Mississippi

Miss. Code ยง85-3-4 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Alabama

Ala. Code ยง6-10-7 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Georgia

O.C.G.A. ยง18-4-1 et seq. โ€” 25% federal CCPA (15% for private student loans)

Florida

Fla. Stat. ยง222.11 โ€” 25% federal CCPA standard (unless head-of-family)

Tennessee

Tenn. Code ยง26-2-106 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Kentucky

KRS ยง427.010 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

South Carolina

S.C. Code ยง37-5-104 โ€” PROHIBITED for consumer debt

North Carolina

N.C. Gen. Stat. ยง1-362 โ€” PROHIBITED for consumer debt (state statute)

Virginia

Va. Code ยง34-29 โ€” 25% / 40ร— federal minimum wage

West Virginia

W. Va. Code ยง38-5A-3 โ€” 20% / 50ร— federal minimum wage

Northeast / Mid-Atlantic

New York

CPLR ยง5231 โ€” 10% of GROSS wages (stricter than federal 25%)

New Jersey

N.J.S.A. ยง2A:17-50 to ยง2A:17-56 โ€” 10% (consumer debt under $7,500 gross)

Pennsylvania

42 Pa.C.S. ยง8127 โ€” PROHIBITED for consumer debt (state statute)

Connecticut

Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง52-361a โ€” 25%

Massachusetts

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 246 ยง28 โ€” 15% (consumer debt)

Rhode Island

R.I. Gen. Laws ยง9-26-4 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Vermont

12 V.S.A. ยง3170 โ€” 15% (consumer debt) / 25% (other)

New Hampshire

N.H. RSA 512 โ€” Non-continuous โ€” single pay period per writ

Maine

14 M.R.S. ยง3127-B โ€” 25% / 40ร— state minimum wage

Maryland

Md. Code, Com. Law ยง15-601.1 โ€” 25% / 30ร— federal minimum wage

Delaware

10 Del. C. ยง4913 โ€” 15% (only for housing/medical/legal services)

District of Columbia

D.C. Code ยง16-572 โ€” 25% / 40ร— DC minimum wage

U.S. Territories

Puerto Rico

32 L.P.R.A. ยง1130 โ€” PROHIBITED for consumer debt

How Garnishment Differs Across Jurisdictions: Worked Examples

Same debtor, same income, same judgment โ€” different state results. Assume a debtor with $1,500/week gross wages, $1,200/week disposable earnings (after taxes and required deductions), and a $25,000 commercial judgment. The garnishable amount per week depends entirely on which state’s wage garnishment statute applies.

Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina: $0 โ€” these states prohibit wage garnishment for consumer debt entirely. The creditor must pivot to bank attachment or property executions. The same applies in Puerto Rico for Commonwealth-jurisdiction wages.

Federal CCPA states (the majority): The lesser of 25% ร— $1,200 = $300, OR amounts above 30 ร— federal $7.25 = $217.50. Result: $300/week garnishable. At this rate, the $25,000 judgment recovers in approximately 84 weeks (about 19 months) before interest.

Massachusetts (15% / 50ร— state min): 15% ร— $1,200 = $180, OR amounts above 50 ร— $15 = $750. The 50ร— floor controls, giving $1,200 โˆ’ $750 = $450 garnishable subject to the 15% cap = $180. Result: $180/week. Recovery time extends to 139 weeks (about 32 months).

Colorado (20% / 40ร— state min of $14.51): 20% ร— $1,200 = $240, OR amounts above 40 ร— $14.51 = $580.40. The 20% cap controls. Result: $240/week. Recovery extends to about 104 weeks.

DC (25% / 40ร— state min of $17.50): 25% ร— $1,200 = $300, OR amounts above 40 ร— $17.50 = $702.40. The floor calculation gives $1,200 โˆ’ $702.40 = $497.60, but the 25% cap limits to $300. Result: $300/week. Same as federal CCPA states. For a lower-income debtor near the floor, DC produces dramatically more protection than federal-floor states.

Related Creditor Resources at People Locator Skip Tracing

Wage garnishment is one component of judgment enforcement strategy. Locating the debtor’s current employer is the gating step in every state with a wage garnishment remedy. Related resources at People Locator Skip Tracing include:

Locate the Debtor’s Employer โ€” Then Garnish

Wage garnishment only works when directed at the right payroll address. People Locator Skip Tracing has been finding current employer information for attorneys, process servers, and debt collectors since 2004. We work all 52 jurisdictions โ€” from California’s 20% / 48ร— state minwage formula to Massachusetts’s 15% / 50ร— to Texas’s prohibition workarounds. Get the current employer; then file the writ that fits the state.

Order Employer Search
๐Ÿ“ž (916) 534-8005

โœ“ 24-hour turnaround ยท โœ“ Skip tracing since 2004 ยท โœ“ Trusted nationwide by attorneys, debt collectors, process servers

People Locator Skip Tracing

Reviewed by People Locator Skip Tracing Investigation Team

Established 2004 · 20+ Years Experience · FCRA · GLBA · DPPA Compliant

A professional skip tracing service trusted by attorneys, process servers, and debt collectors since 2004.

๐Ÿ“… Last Updated: 2026  ยท  ๐Ÿ“œ Jurisdictions covered: All 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico

Legal Disclaimer. This page provides general educational information about wage garnishment laws across U.S. jurisdictions and does not constitute legal advice. Garnishment formulas, procedural rules, statute citations, and minimum-wage figures change frequently โ€” verify current statutory text and consult licensed counsel in the relevant jurisdiction before initiating any enforcement action. This guide is intended for judgment creditors, debt collectors, attorneys, and enforcement professionals operating under DPPA, GLBA, and FCRA permissible-purpose frameworks. ยฉ 2026 People Locator Skip Tracing · Established 2004.