Arizona Judgment Collection
Recording a judgment with an Arizona county recorder does not, by itself, create a lien. A.R.S. section 33-961(A) makes the lien depend on substantial compliance with both that section and section 33-967, and then says it plainly: failure to substantially comply results in the judgment not becoming a lien. Section 33-967 is the separate information statement, and its first required item is the debtor’s correct name and last known address together with the address at which they were served – a locate requirement written into the lien statute itself. Beyond that sit the limits nobody expects. The lien has its own ten-year clock that runs from the date the judgment is given, not from the recording and not from the renewed judgment’s life. On homestead property a title insurer can record a partial release without telling you, or extinguish your lien outright after twenty days’ certified mail. The homestead exemption itself follows the money for eighteen months after a sale but attaches to nothing at all if the debtor refinances. And section 25-215 decides, in four subsections, whether a judgment touches a married debtor’s community property or stops short. Every one of those turns on a documented fact about a parcel, a name, or a title. Establishing those is our half. The research runs on recorded documents and licensed data, opened once a lawful purpose is on record. Nobody on this team holds an Arizona private investigator licence, no law is practised here and no debt is demanded of anyone, and what is set out is general information about Arizona law rather than advice on your matter.
The Recording That Creates No Lien
Arizona conditions the lien on a second document most creditors have never heard of.
A.R.S. section 33-961(A) allows a certified copy of an Arizona court judgment to be filed and recorded with the county recorder in each county where the creditor wants the judgment to become a lien on the debtor’s real property. But the sentence that follows attaches a condition: the judgment becomes a lien on recording in substantial compliance with both the requirements of this section and the requirements of section 33-967 regarding an information statement. And then, so there is no argument about the consequence, the statute states it directly – failure to substantially comply with this section and section 33-967 results in the judgment not becoming a lien.
The certified copy itself has to set out five things under the same subsection: the title of the court, the action and its number; the date of entry and the docket record; the names of the judgment debtor and judgment creditor; the amount of the judgment; and the attorney of record for the creditor. Subsection (C) then requires that a judgment or decree, or any renewal, requiring payment of money be accompanied by the information statement prescribed by section 33-967. Subsection (D) exempts a civil judgment in favour of the state from the information-statement requirement and applies that exemption retroactively.
The practical shape of this is unforgiving. A creditor can pay the recording fee, receive a stamped copy back, file it, and hold nothing. Nothing at the recorder’s counter tests compliance, and the defect usually surfaces years later at a closing, when a title company declines to treat the recorded judgment as a lien at all.
Five Items, and the First One Is an Address
Section 33-967 turns debtor identification into a condition of holding security.
| Required on the information statement | Where it comes from |
|---|---|
| Correct name and last known address of each judgment debtor, and the address at which each received the summons | Research, not the court file. Records |
| Name and address of the judgment creditor | Your own file. |
| Amount as entered or as most recently renewed | The docket. |
| If the debtor is a natural person: social security number, date of birth, driver licence number | Only what is known or lawfully held; the SSN only if the debtor gave it voluntarily. |
| Whether a stay of enforcement has been ordered, and when it expires | The court record. |
Read the first row again. Section 33-967(A)(1) asks for the debtor’s correct name and last known address, and separately for the address at which each judgment debtor received the summons by personal service or by mail. Arizona has written debtor identification into the statute that creates the security interest, which is unusual, and it means a creditor whose file has gone stale has a compliance problem and not merely an inconvenience.
Subsection (B) supplies the necessary realism: the statement must contain the information where it is known to the creditor or available from its records, its attorney’s records, or the court records in the action, and where any required information is not known, the creditor shall so state. The debtor’s social security number is included only if it was provided voluntarily by the debtor. So the statute does not demand the impossible – but it does demand that you have looked, and that gaps be declared rather than left blank.
Subsection (C) offers a cure. A money judgment recorded on or after January 1, 1997 without the separate statement does not become a lien until the creditor records a document entitled “amendment to recorded judgment” containing a compliant statement, identifying the recording date and document number of the original. Subsection (D) then closes the escape hatch: recording an amendment to recorded judgment does not affect the computation of time prescribed by section 33-964. The lien can be fixed. The clock cannot be rewound, and the years between the defective recording and the cure are simply gone.
Watch: What It Reaches
Two documents, one clock, and the release you never see coming.
Watch Overview
The Lien Has Its Own Clock, and It Is Not the Judgment’s
Ten years from the date the judgment is given – not from the day you recorded it.
This is the most commonly misstated rule in Arizona collection, and it is misstated in the same direction every time. Under A.R.S. section 33-964(A), from and after recording as provided in 33-961, a judgment becomes a lien for a period of ten years measured from the date the judgment is given – the date of the judgment itself – on all real property of the debtor in the county where it is recorded, whether owned then or acquired later. The after-acquired reach is genuinely valuable and it is what makes recording early worthwhile. The measuring point is what catches people.
Two errors follow from getting it wrong. The first is assuming the ten years start at the recorder’s counter, which makes a lien recorded in year six look like a decade of security when it is four years. The second, and the one that appears in most secondary write-ups of Arizona law, is assuming the lien simply lasts as long as the judgment does and that renewing the judgment carries the lien along with it. It does not follow automatically; the lien has a term of its own, and keeping security in place is a separate act of recording rather than a by-product of filing a renewal affidavit with the clerk. How the judgment’s own clock and renewal work is the subject of our Arizona judgment collection guide, and the cross-state comparison of what each lien clock runs from sits in the judgment lien guide by state.
Two categories are carved out of the ten years in the same subsection: a civil judgment lien obtained by the state, and a judgment lien for support as defined in section 25-500, both of which remain in effect until satisfied or lifted.
A Title Insurer Can End Your Lien by Certified Mail
On homestead property, and in one case without telling you at all.
Section 33-964(B) governs what happens when homesteaded property subject to a judgment lien is sold, and it is the least-known provision in Arizona judgment law. The order of payment comes first: the judgment creditor is paid from the sale proceeds after the homestead exemption amount is paid to the judgment debtor as prescribed by section 33-1101, and after payment of any liens with priority over the judgment lien. That alone means a lien on a modest homestead is often worth nothing at a sale.
Then the statute gives a private party the power to clear title. After deducting consensual liens and reasonable costs of sale, if the anticipated payment to the judgment debtor is less than eighty percent of the homestead exemption amount, a title insurer or its duly appointed attorney in fact may record a notice of partial release of judgment without prior notice to judgment creditors. No hearing, no motion, and no letter to you.
If the anticipated payment is eighty percent of the exemption amount, the creditor’s lien on the homestead property is extinguished on compliance with a notice procedure. At least twenty days before the sale is final, the title insurer must mail the creditor, by certified mail with return receipt requested, a notice that the lien appears reasonably likely to be extinguished. That notice must contain ten enumerated items, from (a) to (j): the creditor’s name, the current record owner of the property, the street address, the recording reference for the judgment, the expected sale date, the insurer’s basis for concluding the homestead exemption applies, the information used in and the basis and date of calculating the equity, the name of every lienholder to be paid at the sale, the amount paid to each, and the insurer’s basis for its determination.
The operative words for a creditor are “mail” and “twenty days.” The notice goes to the address the insurer has for you, and the window to do anything about it is short. A creditor who has changed firms, sold a portfolio, or simply moved offices since recording may never see it, and the first sign will be a lien that is no longer on title. Keeping a current address of record on your own side is the cheap half of that problem; knowing which of a debtor’s parcels is the homestead and which is not is the other half, and it is a records question.
The Homestead Follows a Sale, Not a Refinance
Eighteen months of protected proceeds, and a hard exclusion.
Section 33-1101(A) lets any Arizona resident aged eighteen or over, married or single, hold as a homestead exempt from attachment, execution and forced sale, not exceeding $400,000 in value, any one of three things: an interest in real property in one compact body with a dwelling house they reside in; an interest in one condominium or cooperative they reside in; or a mobile home, park model trailer, motor home, travel trailer, fifth wheel trailer, houseboat, manufactured home or other form of shelter they reside in, plus the land it sits on. Subsection (B) allows only one homestead per married couple or single person and confirms the value referred to is equity, and caps the total at $400,000 for a residence divided between former spouses.
That figure does not stay still. Subsection (D) adjusts the exemption annually beginning January 1, 2024 and each January afterwards by the increase in the cost of living, measured as the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers as of August of the preceding year over August of the year before that, rounded up to the nearest $100. The dependable facts are therefore the base and the mechanism; any specific current figure needs to be taken from the current year’s published adjustment rather than from the statute or from a secondary write-up. The broader exemption picture is in our Arizona asset exemptions creditors reference.
Subsection (C) is where a creditor’s timing matters. The exemption automatically attaches to the debtor’s interest in identifiable cash proceeds from a voluntary or involuntary sale of the property, and continues for eighteen months after the sale date or until the debtor establishes a new homestead with the proceeds, whichever is shorter. Then the sentence that does the work: the homestead exemption does not attach to identifiable cash proceeds from refinancing the homestead property. Cash taken out on a refinance is not carrying the exemption with it. Subsection (E) lets the parties rely on the property valuation in the final closing disclosure for determining equity or whether the owner is receiving cash back from a refinance, which makes the distinction a documented one rather than an argument.
Subsection (F) adds a bankruptcy rule worth knowing: for a case filed under title 11, the exemption is initially determined as of the petition date, and where the value in the homestead is at or below the statutory amount at filing, the property is one hundred percent exempt, with any increase in value during the case also fully exempt.
Four Subsections Decide Whether Marriage Helps or Hurts
And one of them is about who was named in the lawsuit.
Arizona is a community-property state, which every page about collecting here says and almost none of them cashes out. Section 25-215 does it in four subsections, and they point in different directions.
Subsection (A) closes a door: the separate property of a spouse is not liable for the separate debts or obligations of the other spouse, absent the property owner’s agreement to the contrary. Subsection (B) opens a narrow one: community property is liable for the premarital separate debts or other liabilities of a spouse incurred after September 1, 1973 – but only to the extent of the value of that spouse’s contribution to the community property which would have been that spouse’s separate property if single. That is a measured, capped exposure rather than an on/off switch, and measuring it is an accounting exercise. Subsection (C) reaches sideways: community property is liable for a spouse’s debts incurred outside Arizona during the marriage which would have been community debts if incurred here.
Subsection (D) is the one a judgment creditor lives or dies by. Except as prohibited by section 25-214, either spouse may contract debts and otherwise act for the benefit of the community; and in an action on such a debt or obligation the spouses shall be sued jointly, with the obligation satisfied first from the community property and second from the separate property of the spouse who contracted it. Two things follow. The order of satisfaction is fixed by statute rather than by creditor preference. And the joinder language means the composition of the caption on your judgment is not a formality – whether a judgment naming one married spouse can be enforced against community property is a live legal question, and it is decided by what the complaint did years earlier rather than by anything an enforcement step can repair now.
None of that characterisation is ours to make. Whether a debt is a community obligation, whether joinder was satisfied, and what a particular judgment reaches are legal conclusions for your attorney, and the underlying doctrine is mapped in our Arizona community property laws explainer. What records can show is the factual predicate: whether the debtor appears to be married, which names appear on the deed or the entity filing, and how the target asset is titled.
The Short Version
An Arizona judgment becomes a lien on real property only if the recording substantially complies with both A.R.S. 33-961 and 33-967 – the separate information statement whose first required item is the debtor’s correct name, last known address, and the address at which they were served. Record without it and, in the statute’s own words, the judgment does not become a lien; you may cure it later with an amendment to recorded judgment, but 33-967(D) says the cure does not affect the computation of time. That time is the lien’s own: ten years from the date the judgment is given, not from recording and not coextensive with a renewed judgment. On homestead property the lien is also fragile – a title insurer may record a partial release without notifying you where the debtor’s anticipated proceeds are under eighty percent of the exemption, and may extinguish the lien on twenty days’ certified-mail notice where they reach eighty percent. The homestead itself is $400,000 of equity, indexed each January since 2024, and it follows identifiable proceeds for eighteen months after a sale but attaches to nothing on a refinance. Finally, 25-215 decides whether marriage helps you or stops you: separate property is safe from the other spouse’s separate debts, community property is exposed to premarital debts only up to that spouse’s contribution, and subsection (D) requires spouses to be sued jointly on a community obligation. Which parcel, which title, which name – those are records questions, and answering them with sources is our part. General information, not legal advice.
The Line Between a Record and a Ruling
We produce the first. Arizona counsel produces the second.
Notice what all four statutes above have in common. Section 33-967 wants a name and an address. Section 33-961 wants a parcel in a named county. Section 33-1101 wants to know whether a transaction was a sale or a refinance. Section 25-215 wants to know who holds what, and in what character. None of those is asking for an opinion; all four are asking for something that exists in a record and can be produced with a citation. That is the boundary this firm works on.
Across it lie the conclusions, and they are not ours to reach. Whether a given obligation is a community debt, whether the joinder requirement in 25-215(D) was met by the complaint you filed, whether a homestead claim survives scrutiny, whether a recording substantially complied – those are rulings and arguments about rulings, and they belong to Arizona counsel. Nor do we perform the acts. No judgment is recorded by us, no information statement prepared, no garnishment served, no levy run, and no contact made with a debtor to ask for money.
On our side of the line, the deliverables are concrete: the debtor identified against the judgment so nothing is aimed at a namesake, a corroborated current address plus what the records show of the service history 33-967(A)(1) asks about, a county-by-county picture of recorded real property so a lien is filed where something actually sits, a documented view of which parcel reads as a residence and which does not, and the names in which each holding appears to be titled. All of it comes from public records and lawfully licensed data, worked under a confirmed permissible purpose – enforcing a judgment is one – and none of it from pretexting, impersonation, or the contents of private financial accounts. The same method applied outside Arizona is our skip tracing services.
There is one request that gets declined regardless of the file behind it. Arizona runs an Address Confidentiality Program through the Secretary of State for survivors of domestic violence, sexual offences and stalking, whose entire purpose is to keep a participant out of the residential record trail this firm reads for a living. Some enquiries are not really about a judgment at all. An Arizona order of protection already sitting in the papers, a mailing address that is plainly a forwarding service, a claimed stake nobody can tie back to what the court entered – on any of those the work stops, and we say why it stopped rather than going quiet. A judgment is a permissible purpose for locating a debtor. It is not a key to a protected address.
Every finding is dated, sourced, and carries a plain statement of how confident we are in it, including the unwelcome version – the trail stops here, or this debtor now appears to live in another state, at which point the records get followed over the line and the enforcement question returns to your counsel, as in locating a judgment debtor’s out-of-state assets. First reads on legitimate Arizona matters typically land within 24 hours. Where the whole question is real property, the working method is in finding a judgment debtor’s real estate, and the assembled output in a judgment debtor asset profile report.
Six Arizona Situations Where a Record Is the Answer
Not legal questions. Documented facts that decide which rule applies.
Is the Parcel the Homestead?
33-964(B) only threatens the lien on homestead property.
Which Counties Hold Anything?
A lien binds only where it is recorded.
Whose Names Are on the Deed?
The predicate for any 25-215 analysis.
Was It Sold or Refinanced?
33-1101(C) protects sale proceeds and not refinance cash.
What Address Do We Actually Have?
33-967(A)(1) wants the last known one and the service address.
Is There an Entity in the Way?
Property titled to an LLC is a different question entirely.
The last card is the one that ends the most Arizona files prematurely. A debtor whose home and vehicles are titled to an entity looks judgment-proof on a name search and frequently is not, and the difference between those two conclusions is documentary rather than legal. The general shape of that work is in asset search for judgment collection, and the entity side in collecting a judgment against a business.
Our Commitment
Arizona reaches property through paperwork that has to name things exactly right: a certified copy, an information statement carrying a correct name and a real last known address, a parcel in a county you actually chose on evidence, a deed whose names you have read. Getting those particulars right is the job we take on – the debtor matched to the judgment rather than to a namesake, an address that has been corroborated rather than copied forward, the counties where recorded property genuinely sits, the residence told apart from the rest, and the names on each title as the records carry them. What any of that means under 25-215, under 33-1101, or for the sufficiency of a recording is your attorney’s to say. Our side of it stays documentary, as it has since 2004: county recorder indexes and licensed data, searched under a permissible purpose, with nobody posing as a relative, a creditor or the debtor, and no account contents sought at any point.
What an Arizona Judgment Reaches
Does recording my judgment in Arizona automatically create a lien?
No. A.R.S. 33-961(A) makes the lien depend on recording in substantial compliance with both that section and section 33-967, which requires a separate information statement, and states that failure to substantially comply results in the judgment not becoming a lien. A creditor can record, pay the fee, and hold no security at all, and the defect typically surfaces years later at a closing rather than at the recorder’s counter.
What must the Arizona information statement contain?
Five items under A.R.S. 33-967(A): the correct name and last known address of each judgment debtor plus the address at which each received the summons; the name and address of the judgment creditor; the amount of the judgment as entered or most recently renewed; the debtor’s social security number, date of birth and driver licence number if a natural person; and whether a stay of enforcement has been ordered and when it expires. Subsection (B) requires the information where known or available from the creditor’s, its attorney’s, or the court’s records, and requires the creditor to state where something is not known.
Can I fix a recording that left out the information statement?
Yes, by recording a document entitled amendment to recorded judgment that contains a compliant statement and identifies the recording date and document number of the original, under 33-967(C). But subsection (D) provides that recording an amendment does not affect the computation of time prescribed by section 33-964, so the cure restores the lien going forward without restoring the years lost between the defective recording and the amendment.
How long does an Arizona judgment lien last?
Ten years measured from the date the judgment is given, under A.R.S. 33-964(A), which is the date of the judgment rather than the date you recorded it. The lien reaches all the debtor’s real property in the county where it is recorded, whether owned at the time or acquired later. Two categories run differently: a civil judgment lien obtained by the state and a judgment lien for support under section 25-500 remain in effect until satisfied or lifted.
Can someone remove my Arizona lien without telling me?
On homestead property, in one situation, yes. Under 33-964(B), if the anticipated payment to the judgment debtor at a sale is less than eighty percent of the homestead exemption amount, a title insurer or its attorney in fact may record a notice of partial release of judgment without prior notice to judgment creditors. Where the anticipated payment reaches eighty percent, the lien is extinguished on compliance with a certified-mail notice sent at least twenty days before the sale is final and containing ten specified items.
Does Arizona’s homestead exemption follow the money?
After a sale, for a limited time. A.R.S. 33-1101(C) attaches the exemption automatically to identifiable cash proceeds from a voluntary or involuntary sale, continuing for eighteen months after the sale or until the debtor establishes a new homestead with the proceeds, whichever period is shorter. The same subsection states that the exemption does not attach to identifiable cash proceeds from refinancing the homestead property, which is a meaningful distinction where a debtor has taken cash out rather than sold.
Can I reach community property on a judgment naming one spouse?
That is exactly what A.R.S. 25-215 governs, and it is a legal question for your counsel rather than one we answer. Subsection (D) provides that on a debt contracted by either spouse for the benefit of the community the spouses shall be sued jointly, and that the obligation is satisfied first from community property and second from the separate property of the contracting spouse. Subsection (A) keeps a spouse’s separate property out of reach of the other spouse’s separate debts, and subsection (B) exposes community property to premarital debts only up to that spouse’s contribution to the community.
How does this page differ from your Arizona judgment collection guide?
This page owns what an Arizona judgment reaches: the two documents a lien depends on, the lien’s own ten-year clock, the title insurer’s power to release or extinguish it on homestead property, the homestead exemption with its eighteen-month proceeds rule and refinancing exclusion, and community-property liability under 25-215. The Arizona judgment collection guide owns the clock and the procedure – the enforceability period and its 2013 and 2018 cut-offs, the ninety-day renewal affidavit, the ten percent earnings cap, the writ of garnishment, and the debtor’s examination.
See What Your Arizona Judgment Can Reach
A lien is only as good as the parcel behind it, and the recording is only as good as the debtor details on the information statement. Send the debtor’s details, whatever you already hold, and the purpose the search is being run for. Back comes the recorded Arizona property, the county it sits in and the names on each title, written up so your attorney can file from it, usually with something to read inside 24 hours. Contact us to get started.
Start Your Request →
