Arizona Asset Exemptions for Creditors
Holding an Arizona judgment is only half the battle. The other half is knowing what the law actually lets you reach, because Proposition 209 rewrote the state’s exemption rules and made Arizona one of the hardest places in the country to collect. The homestead jumped to $400,000, the bank-account shield rose to five thousand, and wage garnishment was slashed from twenty-five percent to ten. This guide maps the post-Prop-209 exemption schedule against what a writ can still capture, and explains why a focused asset search is the step that turns a paper judgment into money. General legal information for Arizona creditors and debtors, not legal advice.
The Short Version
Arizona is now one of the most debtor-protective collection states in the nation, and Proposition 209 (effective December fifth, two thousand twenty-two) is the reason. The homestead exemption protects more than $400,000 of home equity and adjusts upward every January for inflation; the motor-vehicle exemption is $15,000, or $25,000 for a disabled debtor; household goods are protected to $15,000; a single bank account is shielded to $5,000; and wage garnishment is capped at the lesser of ten percent of disposable earnings or the amount over sixty times the highest applicable minimum wage. Retirement accounts, Social Security, and most benefits are fully off-limits. What a judgment can still reach is the equity, the cash, and the assets above those caps, and the only way to know which of those a particular debtor has is a documented asset search. We are a public-records research firm; for a creditor with a valid judgment and a permissible purpose, we locate the non-exempt assets, typically within 24 hours.
Watch: What an Arizona Judgment Can Reach
How Prop 209 reshaped what creditors can collect.
Watch Overview
Why Exemptions Matter Before You Enforce
The first question is not “do I have a judgment” but “what can I reach.”
Every Arizona judgment creditor has to answer one question before spending another dollar on enforcement: what property can a writ actually capture? Arizona’s exemption statutes do not erase a debt, and they do not make a debtor judgment-proof by themselves. What they do is draw a hard line around specific assets and specific dollar amounts, and on the protected side of that line a sheriff cannot seize, a bank cannot be made to freeze, and an employer cannot be ordered to withhold. Filing a writ of execution against property that sits entirely behind an exemption simply burns the filing fee, the sheriff’s deposit, and the attorney time, and returns nothing.
The good news for creditors is that Arizona’s exemption regime is statutory, well-defined, and fully investigable. A debtor’s exemptions are not negotiated and they are not discretionary; they are fixed entitlements tied to particular categories of property and particular equity values set out in A.R.S. Title 33, Chapter 8. Because the rules are known in advance, a creditor who does the homework can predict, before filing anything, whether enforcement against a given car, account, or parcel will succeed or run straight into an exemption wall.
That is the spirit of this page. Read the exemption schedule not as a list of obstacles but as a navigation map for the enforcement terrain: which assets are worth pursuing, which should be skipped, and where a professional asset search produces the strongest collection return. The figures below are current post-Proposition-209 amounts taken from the Arizona Revised Statutes themselves, but several of them adjust for inflation every January, so confirm the year’s figure for any high-stakes decision. This is general legal information, not legal advice; for advice on a specific judgment, consult an Arizona attorney.
The Proposition 209 Earthquake
Why Arizona collection economics changed overnight in late 2022.
If you are working from older Arizona collection knowledge, throw most of it out. On November 8, two thousand twenty-two, Arizona voters passed Proposition 209, the Predatory Debt Collection Protection Act, and it took effect December fifth of that year. The measure did not tinker at the margins; it dramatically raised the dollar shields on a debtor’s core assets and, in the same stroke, cut the share of wages a creditor can take by more than half. For a creditor, Prop 209 is the single most important fact about collecting in Arizona today, and ignoring it leads directly to wasted writs and miscalculated payoff timelines.
Three changes carry almost all the weight. First, the homestead exemption rose from $250,000 to $400,000, and it now adjusts upward every January for inflation, so the live figure today sits above four hundred thousand. Second, the protected balance in a single bank account rose to $5,000 under 33-1126(A)(9), from a token figure, and it is now among the most generous single-account shields in the country. Third, and most consequential for everyday consumer collection, the wage-garnishment ceiling dropped from twenty-five percent of disposable earnings to ten percent, with the protected floor raised from thirty times to sixty times the highest applicable minimum wage. Prop 209 also capped interest on medical debt. Each of these is a figure that would be flatly wrong on any other state’s page, and each one is examined in detail below.
The Arizona Exemption Schedule Pre- vs Post-Prop-209
What changed, what a judgment leaves behind, and what it can still reach.
| Asset Class | Pre-Prop-209 | Post-Prop-209 (Current) | A.R.S. Cite | What a Creditor Can Still Reach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homestead (home equity) | $250,000 | $400,000+ (CPI-adjusted yearly) | 33-1101 | Only equity above the cap; lien sits passive otherwise |
| Motor vehicle | $6,000 | $15,000 (25,000 if disabled) | 33-1125(8) | Equity over the cap on a paid-off or high-value vehicle |
| Single bank account | A token amount | $5,000 (CPI-adjusted yearly) | 33-1126(A)(9) | Funds above the cap; non-exempt deposits in other accounts |
| Wages (disposable, weekly) | 25% / 30x min wage | 10% / 60x min wage | 33-1131 | The lesser of 10% or the amount over the 60x floor |
| Household goods & furnishings | $6,000 | $15,000 aggregate | 33-1123 | Rarely worth levy; resale value is low |
| Tools of the trade | Not among the Prop 209 increases | $5,000 aggregate trade tools; farm machinery $2,500 separately and concurrently | 33-1130(1), (2) | Business equipment value above whichever cap applies |
| Retirement / IRA / 401(k) | Exempt | Exempt, generally no dollar cap | 33-1126(B) | Effectively nothing; off-limits |
| Social Security / unemployment | Exempt | Fully exempt (if not commingled) | 42 U.S.C. 407; A.R.S. 23-783 | Nothing; protected even once deposited |
Read across the bottom-right column: in a typical Arizona consumer case the reachable money is not wages, not the house, and not the retirement account, but the slice of equity, cash, or business value that pokes above each cap. That is precisely the slice a routine credit report or a guess will not reveal. The homestead, vehicle, household-goods and bank-account figures each carry an annual cost-of-living adjustment beginning January first, two thousand twenty-four, so treat the printed dollar amounts as a floor and verify the current-year number before a high-value levy. Two rows deserve a note. Tools of the trade were not touched by Proposition 209 at all, and the two figures in that row are not a before-and-after pair: A.R.S. section 33-1130 grants $5,000 of trade tools under paragraph 1 and, separately and at the same time, $2,500 of farm machinery, feed, seed, grain and animals under paragraph 2 to a debtor whose primary income comes from farming. A debtor may qualify for one, the other, or neither. And this schedule is the collection view; if the debtor files bankruptcy the same caps are read through a different lens, with a federal ceiling of its own, which we cover in Arizona bankruptcy exemptions.
Arizona’s Homestead Exemption A.R.S. 33-1101
The four-hundred-thousand-dollar shield and the passive lien.
The homestead is the centerpiece of Arizona’s post-Prop-209 framework. Under A.R.S. section 33-1101, a qualifying Arizona resident may protect $400,000 of equity in a dwelling used as the primary residence, whether that is a house, condominium, mobile home, or the land it sits on. The statute does more than name a figure: subsection (D) directs the amount to be adjusted every January first, beginning in two thousand twenty-four, by the prior August’s increase in the Consumer Price Index, rounded up to the nearest $100. The practical consequence is that the live exemption today is higher than four hundred thousand and climbs each year. Note what subsection (D) does not do: it names the Bureau of Labor Statistics index but designates no agency to publish the resulting dollar amount, which is why both the statute and the Arizona courts’ own public materials still print $400,000, and why published guides disagree with one another by six figures. Treat $400,000 as the floor, run the subsection (D) formula for the year in question, and confirm it before a high-value decision.
Two features make the Arizona homestead especially formidable for creditors. First, it is automatic. Under A.R.S. section 33-1102 the protection attaches by operation of law to a qualifying residence with no declaration, recording, or filing required, unlike states that demand a recorded homestead deed. That same section holds a tool most creditors never use: where a debtor owns more than one property to which the homestead could apply, a creditor may demand by certified mail, return receipt requested, that the debtor designate which one, and a debtor who does not answer within thirty days may afterwards assert the homestead only by recording a claim. Second, the protection is generous enough that for most Arizona homes the entire equity stack sits behind it. A judgment creditor can still record a civil judgment as a lien against real property, and since House Bill 2617 of the 55th Legislature, first regular session, amended A.R.S. sections 33-964 and 33-1103 in 2021, that recorded judgment can attach even to homestead property. The rule that decides whether it does anything is A.R.S. section 33-1103, subsection A, paragraph 4: a recorded civil judgment or other nonconsensual lien is an exception to the homestead only if the debtor’s equity in the property exceeds the exemption. In the common case the lien is therefore passive: it encumbers title, a title company will not insure over it, and it gets paid out of proceeds whenever the home is sold or refinanced, but it produces no immediate cash.
When there is equity to chase, the remedy and its risk both live in A.R.S. section 33-1105. A judgment creditor may force a judicial sale of homestead property only where the debtor’s interest exceeds the homestead plus the balance of any consensual liens, no bid may be accepted that does not exceed that sum plus the costs of sale, and the debtor is paid the homestead amount first out of the proceeds. If the sale never happens, because no sufficient bid arrives or the creditor abandons the attempt, the creditor may not charge its costs or attorney fees for the sale to the debtor. A failed homestead sale is eaten by the creditor who started it. That is the sharpest argument on this page for doing the property and lien work before filing anything: the question is not whether the debtor owns a house but whether a particular property carries equity beyond the cap and above the senior liens, and only a property and lien search answers it.
Vehicles, Household Goods & Personal Property
The fifteen-thousand-dollar car and what else is shielded.
Proposition 209 more than doubled Arizona’s motor-vehicle exemption. Under A.R.S. section 33-1125(8) a debtor may protect $15,000 of equity in one motor vehicle, and that figure rises to $25,000 where the debtor or a dependent has a physical disability. Because the exemption applies to equity, a financed vehicle with little equity is effectively unreachable even when its sticker value is high; only a paid-off or high-value vehicle whose equity clears the cap leaves something for a creditor, and even then the costs of seizure, towing, storage, and sale often eat the margin. This is one more figure that adjusts annually, so confirm the current amount before treating a vehicle as a target.
Beyond the car, the personal-property exemptions are broad but mostly low-value. A.R.S. section 33-1123 protects $15,000 in aggregate value of household furniture, furnishings, goods, and appliances. A.R.S. section 33-1125 layers on specific shields that are useful to know but rarely worth a levy: $500 of wearing apparel, $2,000 of engagement and wedding rings, $250 of books, $400 of musical instruments, one watch up to $250, and all domestic animals and household pets with no dollar limit. The takeaway for a creditor is blunt: physical household property is almost never a productive collection target in Arizona. The resale value is low, the exemptions are high, and a sheriff’s levy on furniture or clothing produces humiliation and cost without recovery. The money in Arizona consumer cases is in equity, accounts, and business interests, not in a debtor’s living room.
Wages: The One Exemption This Page Does Not Work Out
The headline rule, and where the calculation lives.
A.R.S. section 33-1131, subsection B caps a non-support garnishment at the lesser of ten percent of disposable earnings for the week or the amount by which those earnings exceed sixty times the applicable minimum hourly wage, and the statute defines the applicable wage as the minimum required by federal, state or local law, whichever is highest. That is the whole rule a creditor needs in order to size an Arizona judgment: the percentage is ten, not the federal twenty-five, and the floor is sixty times, not thirty.
The worked calculation, the hardship provision in A.R.S. section 12-1598.10 and the unresolved conflict between that section’s description of a “twenty-five percent maximum” and 33-1131(B)’s plain ten percent belong to a sibling page, and are set out in full in our guide to Arizona wage garnishment laws. This page deliberately stops here rather than restating them, and it does not name a hardship percentage, because the two statutes do not state one consistently and the Arizona courts’ own public materials decline to name one. The practical point for enforcement planning is unchanged: wage garnishment in Arizona is a slow drip, not a faucet, and a payoff projection built on the old twenty-five-percent assumption will be off by a factor of more than two.
Bank Accounts, Retirement & Benefits
The five-thousand-dollar account shield and the untouchable categories.
Bank levies once made sense in Arizona because the account exemption was a token amount. Prop 209 changed that too. A.R.S. section 33-1126(A)(9) now protects a total of $5,000 held in a single account in any one financial institution, and like the homestead and vehicle figures it adjusts annually for inflation. $5,000 is among the highest single-account shields in the nation, and because most consumer checking and savings balances live below it, the routine bank levy that used to be a creditor’s first move now frequently comes back empty. The exemption is per account at one institution, which is a detail worth investigating: a debtor with several accounts across several banks does not multiply the protection without limit, and balances above the protected amount remain reachable.
Several categories are off the table entirely. Under A.R.S. section 33-1126(B), ERISA-qualified plans, traditional and Roth IRAs, 401(k) and 403(b) accounts, and similar tax-qualified retirement vehicles are generally exempt from process without a dollar cap, a protection reinforced for ERISA plans by federal preemption under 29 U.S.C. section 1144. Subsection (B) does carve out an alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order, though the alternate payee’s own interest is then exempt from that payee’s creditors, so the carve-out shifts the protection rather than removing it. Social Security, unemployment compensation, workers’ compensation, and child support remain protected even after they are deposited, but the authority for each sits somewhere different and none of it sits in 33-1126(A). Social Security is federal: 42 U.S.C. section 407 puts benefits beyond execution, levy, attachment, garnishment or other legal process. Arizona unemployment benefits are exempt under A.R.S. section 23-783, which protects them “as long as they are not commingled with other funds of the recipient” and voids any waiver, and workers’ compensation sits in A.R.S. section 23-1068. Child support received is exempt under 33-1126(A)(3). The common thread is traceability, which is why a creditor levying an account must reckon with the possibility that the balance is benefit money the law puts out of reach. Add the five-thousand-dollar cash shield to those traceable protections and the realistic conclusion is that most Arizona consumer bank accounts hold little a creditor can immediately seize. The productive targets move elsewhere: investment and brokerage accounts that are not retirement-qualified, business receivables, and secondary real property.
Where a Judgment Can Still Win
The non-exempt targets Prop 209 left intact.
Equity Above the Caps
Home equity over four hundred thousand, vehicle equity over fifteen thousand, and accounts over five thousand are all reachable. A search confirms whether any exists.
Non-Retirement Accounts
Brokerage and investment accounts that are not tax-qualified fall outside the retirement shield and remain open to a writ.
Business Interests
Ownership stakes, receivables, and equipment value above the tools-of-trade cap are frequently overlooked and frequently reachable.
Secondary Real Property
Rentals, vacation homes, and land that are not the primary residence get no homestead shield at all.
Voidable Transfers
Assets shuffled to relatives or entities before judgment can be unwound under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act within the limitation window.
Excess Wage Drip
Even at ten percent, garnishment on a steady high earner adds up over a ten-year judgment life when the employer is correctly identified.
Voidable Transfers, Writs & Examinations
The procedural toolkit, and the window that closes on fraud.
Unwinding a fraudulent transfer
Arizona’s fraudulent-transfer law lives in the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act at A.R.S. section 44-1001 and following. A transfer becomes voidable when it was made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, or when it was made for less than reasonably equivalent value while the debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result. The limitation period is the trap: a creditor generally has four years from the transfer, or one year from when the transfer could reasonably have been discovered, whichever is later. Many Arizona debtors move assets to relatives or shell entities in the months before litigation, and those transfers often stay buried through pre-judgment discovery and surface only afterward through professional asset investigation. A creditor who catches the transfer inside the window can unwind it and pull the property back into reach; a creditor who misses it loses the remedy permanently, even if the fraud later becomes obvious. Two Arizona-specific points sit alongside this. Whose name is on an asset does not by itself settle whether a judgment reaches it, because Arizona is a community-property state and the answer turns on when and for whose benefit the obligation arose, which is the ground covered in our guide to Arizona marital property rules. And a creditor cannot contract around any of this in advance: under A.R.S. section 33-1132 a waiver of the exemption rights provided by this article is void and unenforceable notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary, save for the narrow carve-out that section makes for 33-1122, which is the rule that a security interest, pledge or lease repossession beats the exemption in the first place.
Writs, levies, and the debtor’s examination
Once a judgment is final, the writ of execution is the workhorse: the clerk issues it, the sheriff levies on it, and it must usually be backed by an advance deposit covering the sheriff’s costs. An earnings-withholding order is the wage-garnishment vehicle served on the employer; a bank levy is a writ served on the financial institution; and a personal-property levy requires the sheriff to physically seize the item, sometimes with locksmith and storage expense that has to pencil out against the asset’s value. Real-property execution sales add publication and minimum-bid procedures that vary by county. The most powerful and most underused tool is the post-judgment debtor’s examination, which compels the debtor to appear and answer under oath about assets, employment, and holdings, with contempt as the penalty for not showing. An examination is dramatically more effective when the creditor walks in holding documented asset-search results, because a debtor who denies owning an asset the creditor has already proven is exposed to perjury and loses all credibility for the rest of the case.
Judgment Lifespan & Creditor Strategy
Ten years to collect, and how to spend them well in a Prop-209 world.
An Arizona judgment is enforceable for ten years from entry and can be renewed for successive ten-year periods under A.R.S. section 12-1612 by filing a renewal affidavit. The window is narrower than most creditors assume, and it is the detail that kills judgments: subsection (B) permits the affidavit to be filed only within the ninety days preceding the expiration of ten years from the date the judgment was entered. Filing in year three does not renew anything. Miss the ninety-day window and the judgment becomes unenforceable, the underlying claim cannot be relitigated, and the lien protections vanish, even when the debtor’s identity, location, and assets are all known. A judgment acquired in a portfolio purchase needs that date calendared on the day it is acquired, alongside the rest of an Arizona collection workup. Ten years is longer than the enforcement window in several neighboring western states, which makes patient, well-documented Arizona judgments worth keeping alive, especially against debtors who own appreciating real property.
Strategy in post-Prop-209 Arizona follows directly from the numbers above. The ten-percent wage cap means routine consumer wage garnishment collects slowly, stretching every payoff timeline well past what a creditor working from the federal twenty-five-percent standard would project. The four-hundred-thousand-dollar homestead paired with the judgment-lien provisions in A.R.S. sections 33-964 and 33-1103 means recording a lien against a home is a long-term encumbrance that pays at sale or refinance rather than an immediate recovery. The five-thousand-dollar account shield means bank levies should be aimed at accounts a search shows to be funded above the cap, not fired blindly. The smart Arizona creditor therefore front-loads investigation, identifies the handful of non-exempt assets that actually exist, times wage garnishment against a verified current employer, records liens for the long game, and renews on schedule. Prop 209 also capped medical-debt interest at three percent per year or the one-year Treasury rate, whichever is less, which means debt buyers holding medical paper should reassess whether extended collection still pencils out.
Why the Asset Search Comes First
How a public-records research firm turns a judgment into a target list.
Confirm the Judgment & Purpose
A valid Arizona judgment plus a permissible purpose under FCRA, GLBA, and DPPA is the lawful basis for the search. We work for creditors, not against privacy.
Map What the Debtor Owns
Real property across Arizona counties and other states, vehicle registrations, business interests, accounts, and employment, all from public records and licensed databases.
Screen Against Exemptions
Each asset is measured against its A.R.S. cap, so you see equity above the homestead, the vehicle, and the account shields, not just gross holdings.
Deliver a Documented Target List
You receive evidence of actual, non-exempt holdings with location and valuation, typically within 24 hours, ready for a writ, a levy, or a debtor’s exam.
Arizona’s exemption framework rewards the creditor who investigates before executing. Three questions decide whether any enforcement action recovers a dollar: what does this debtor actually own, is it located where an Arizona court can execute, and does its value exceed the applicable exemption? Statutes alone answer none of those; only a factual asset search does. Creditors who skip the investigation and file blind collect the predictable harvest of writs returned “property not found,” empty bank levies, employers reporting the debtor no longer works there, and examinations where the debtor confidently disclaims everything the creditor cannot independently prove. The cost of investigation is almost always lower than the cost of repeated failed enforcement.
Who We Help in Arizona
Lawful asset research for the holder of a valid judgment.
Arizona Judgment Holders
Non-exempt assets located
Enforcement Counsel
Pre-writ asset intelligence
Post-Judgment Agencies
Portfolio asset screening
Arizona Rental Owners
Tenant judgment recovery
Small-Business Owners
Unpaid invoices enforced
Judgment Buyers
Acquired judgment workups
Whatever your role, the wall is the same: you cannot levy on an asset you have not found, and in Arizona you cannot waste a writ on an asset the exemptions put out of reach. We are a public-records research firm, not a law firm, not a collection agency, and not a credit-reporting agency, and we do not give legal advice or attempt collection. What we do, for a creditor holding a valid judgment with a permissible purpose, is locate the non-exempt assets through lawful skip tracing and public-records research. The work pairs naturally with locating a debtor through our find someone in Arizona guide, and with the asset-exemption playbooks for other states such as Montana, Connecticut and Maryland’s exemption schedule when a debtor or property crosses state lines. For an Arizona matter with a lawful basis, a verified asset workup typically comes back within 24 hours.
Our Commitment
For a creditor holding a valid Arizona judgment and a permissible purpose, we find the non-exempt assets so your enforcement lands, not the protected ones that waste a writ, measured against the post-Prop-209 exemption schedule and delivered as documented evidence. Lawful, FCRA- and GLBA-compliant asset research since 2004. Nobody at this firm is a licensed private investigator, and where an asset request looks less like judgment enforcement than like domestic violence, stalking, or harassment looking for an address, it draws more scrutiny at intake, not less, and we decline it. We also do not obtain records by pretexting: we do not pose as the debtor, a relative, a banker, or a court, and we will not misrepresent who is asking or why.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Arizona homestead exemption amount after Prop 209?
Under A.R.S. section 33-1101, Proposition 209 raised the homestead exemption from $250,000 to $400,000 of equity in a primary residence, effective December fifth, two thousand twenty-two. The amount adjusts upward every January for inflation, so the current figure is above four hundred thousand. Protection is automatic, with no declaration required. This is general information; confirm the current-year figure for a specific matter.
How much of a debtor’s wages can a creditor garnish in Arizona?
Arizona has one of the most debtor-protective wage rules in the country. Under A.R.S. section 33-1131, as amended by Prop 209, a non-support creditor may take only the lesser of ten percent of disposable weekly earnings or the amount over sixty times the applicable minimum wage, which the statute defines as the highest of the federal, state or local minimum. That is far below the federal twenty-five percent and thirty-times standard. A court may reduce the withheld amount further on clear and convincing evidence of extreme economic hardship under A.R.S. section 12-1598.10, which sets a statutory floor rather than eliminating the garnishment; we do not print a hardship percentage here because 12-1598.10 and 33-1131 do not state one consistently.
What is Arizona’s bank account exemption?
Proposition 209 raised the single-account exemption to $5,000 under A.R.S. section 33-1126(A)(9), from a token prior figure, and it adjusts annually for inflation on the same formula as the homestead. The protection is per account at one institution. Combined with traceable Social Security, unemployment, and child-support protections, most Arizona consumer accounts hold little a creditor can immediately seize; funds above the cap remain reachable.
How much is the Arizona motor vehicle exemption?
Under A.R.S. section 33-1125(8), Prop 209 raised the vehicle exemption to $15,000 of equity in one vehicle, or $25,000 if the debtor or a dependent has a physical disability, up from six thousand. Because it applies to equity, a financed car is usually unreachable; only a paid-off or high-value vehicle with equity above the cap leaves anything, and seizure costs often consume the margin. The amount adjusts annually.
Are Arizona retirement accounts protected from a judgment?
Yes. Under A.R.S. section 33-1126(B), ERISA-qualified plans, traditional and Roth IRAs, 401(k) and 403(b) accounts, and similar tax-qualified plans are generally exempt without a dollar cap, reinforced for ERISA plans by federal preemption. Social Security, unemployment, workers’ compensation, and child support stay protected even after deposit if traceable to their exempt source. Non-retirement brokerage accounts, by contrast, are reachable.
Can a creditor put a lien on an Arizona homestead?
Yes, but it is usually passive. Since House Bill 2617 of 2021 amended A.R.S. sections 33-964 and 33-1103, a recorded civil judgment can attach as a lien to real property, including homestead. Under 33-1103(A)(4) it is an exception to the homestead only where the debtor’s equity exceeds the exemption, so it cannot force a sale below that line, but it encumbers title, blocks clean title insurance, and is paid from proceeds at sale or refinance. Where there is equity to reach, 33-1105 governs the judicial sale, and it makes the creditor absorb its own costs and fees if the sale never happens.
How long does an Arizona judgment last?
An Arizona judgment is enforceable for ten years from entry and can be renewed for additional ten-year periods under A.R.S. section 12-1612 by filing a renewal affidavit. Subsection (B) allows that affidavit only within the ninety days preceding the ten-year expiry, not at any time before it, so an early filing does not renew anything. Miss the window and the judgment becomes unenforceable and cannot be revived, which is why the renewal calendar is the single most important discipline in managing an Arizona judgment portfolio.
Do you collect the debt or seize the assets yourselves?
No. We are a public-records research firm, not a law firm or a collection agency, and not a consumer reporting agency; an Arizona asset workup is not a consumer report and cannot be used for an employment, tenancy, credit, or insurance decision. For a creditor with a valid judgment and a permissible purpose under FCRA, GLBA, and DPPA, we locate and document the debtor’s non-exempt assets so your attorney, sheriff, or process can act on them. We do not give legal advice, file writs, or attempt collection. A verified Arizona asset workup typically comes back within 24 hours.
Holding an Arizona Judgment You Can’t Collect On?
Prop 209 shields the home, the car, and the paycheck, but not the equity, the cash, or the business interests above those caps. For a creditor with a valid judgment and a permissible purpose, we locate the non-exempt assets and document them, typically within 24 hours. Contact us to get started.
Start Your Asset Search →
