Florida Judgment Collection

Florida Wage Garnishment Laws

Florida is one of the hardest states in the country to garnish wages, and the reason is a single state statute that most out-of-state collection playbooks ignore. A creditor who wins a money judgment here cannot simply send a writ to the debtor’s payroll department the way they might elsewhere. Florida’s head-of-family exemption can shield a working parent’s entire paycheck, no matter how high the income, unless the debtor signed it away in advance. This guide explains exactly how the exemption works under Florida Statute section 222.11, where the federal twenty-five-percent ceiling still applies, the writ-of-garnishment procedure and its deadlines, and why locating where someone actually banks and works is the part of judgment enforcement that decides whether you ever collect.

Fla. Stat. 222.11 Public-Records Research Since 2004
222.11Head-of-Family Statute
Full WageExemption Possible
20 DaysTo Claim Exemption
20 YearsJudgment Lifespan

The Short Version

Florida layers a strong state exemption on top of the federal wage-garnishment cap. A debtor who is “head of family” – meaning they provide more than half the support of a child or other dependent – is treated very differently from one who is not. If a head of family’s disposable earnings are seven hundred fifty dollars a week or less, every dollar is exempt and cannot be garnished by an ordinary creditor at all. Earnings above that weekly figure are still exempt unless the debtor agreed in writing, in advance, to allow the garnishment. A debtor who is not head of family falls back to the federal formula – the lesser of twenty-five percent of disposable earnings or the amount over thirty times the federal minimum wage. Either way, after a writ issues the debtor has twenty days to file a claim of exemption, and child support and certain tax debts follow their own rules entirely. Because the wage route is so often blocked here, the practical question for a Florida judgment creditor is rarely the law – it is finding the right employer, the right bank, and the non-exempt assets. That locate is what we do.

Watch: Florida Wage Garnishment

How the head-of-family exemption changes everything.

▶ Video Overview

The One Rule That Defines Florida

Everything about garnishing wages here turns on a single status.

Most states let an ordinary judgment creditor garnish a slice of almost any employee’s paycheck. Florida does not work that way, and the difference is Florida Statute section 222.11, the head-of-family exemption. The statute asks one threshold question before anything else: is the debtor the head of a family? The answer reroutes the entire analysis, because a head of family enjoys a protection so broad that it can shield an entire paycheck from creditors regardless of how large that paycheck is.

Under the statute, “head of family” means any natural person who provides more than one-half of the support for a child or other dependent. That is a support test, not a marital-status test – a single parent, an adult supporting an aging relative, or a spouse who is the household’s primary earner can all qualify. Only one person can claim head-of-family status for the same dependents, so two spouses cannot both shelter their wages on the strength of the same child. The label sounds quaint, but in Florida it is the most consequential word in the entire garnishment process, and getting it wrong is how out-of-state creditors waste a year chasing a paycheck they were never going to reach.

The statute also defines the figure it operates on. Disposable earnings are the part of a person’s earnings left after subtracting the amounts the law requires the employer to withhold – federal income tax, Social Security, Medicare, and the like. Voluntary deductions such as retirement contributions or health-plan buy-ups do not reduce disposable earnings. That definition matters, because both the Florida exemption and the federal cap are measured against disposable earnings rather than gross pay.

The Seven-Hundred-Fifty Weekly Threshold

Where the line sits, and what crossing it actually changes.

Section 222.11 splits head-of-family debtors into two groups using a single weekly number. If a head of family’s disposable earnings are seven hundred fifty dollars a week or less, all of those earnings are exempt from attachment or garnishment. Not a percentage of them – all of them. An ordinary creditor with a valid Florida judgment cannot reach one dollar of that paycheck through wage garnishment. This is the protection that surprises creditors who assume the federal twenty-five-percent rule sets a national floor; in Florida, for a lower-earning head of family, the floor is zero.

Earnings above the weekly threshold are where the second, less obvious rule lives. Disposable earnings of a head of family that are greater than seven hundred fifty dollars a week may not be garnished unless the debtor has agreed otherwise in writing. Read that carefully: the income over the line is not automatically fair game. It remains exempt by default, and a creditor can reach it only if the debtor signed a written agreement consenting to the garnishment. There is no income ceiling on the protection – a head of family earning two thousand dollars a week is shielded on the same terms as one earning five hundred, absent that written waiver.

The written waiver is narrow and formal

Because the written-consent exception would swallow the protection if applied loosely, Florida polices the form of the waiver. To be valid, the consent generally must be a separate document attached to the underlying contract, written in the same language as that contract, and printed in at least fourteen-point type, in substantially the form the statute prescribes. A boilerplate line buried in a long loan agreement, or a waiver that does not meet the formatting requirements, can be challenged as invalid. In practice this means that for the great majority of consumer debts – medical bills, credit cards reduced to judgment, ordinary money judgments between individuals – no qualifying waiver exists, and the head-of-family exemption stands. Creditors who count on reaching the over-threshold income usually find there was never an enforceable agreement reaching it.

Worked Examples: Who Gets Garnished

The same paycheck, four different outcomes, driven by status.

Head of family, below the threshold

Consider a debtor who supports two children and takes home six hundred dollars a week in disposable earnings. Because that figure is at or below seven hundred fifty dollars and the debtor is head of family, the entire paycheck is exempt. An ordinary creditor recovers nothing through wage garnishment, even with a perfectly valid judgment. This is the most common real-world result in Florida and the reason creditors so often pivot away from wages entirely.

Head of family, above the threshold, no written consent

Now raise that same parent’s disposable earnings to nine hundred dollars a week, with no signed waiver. The first seven hundred fifty dollars is exempt automatically, and the excess – one hundred fifty dollars – stays exempt as well, because there is no written agreement allowing it to be reached. The result is the same as the first example: zero is garnished. Without a qualifying waiver, the over-threshold income is protected, not available.

Head of family, above the threshold, with valid written consent

Take the nine-hundred-dollar earner again, but assume a lender obtained a properly formatted, fourteen-point, separately attached written waiver at the time of the loan. Now the first seven hundred fifty dollars remains exempt, while the excess above the threshold can be reached – subject to the federal cap discussed below. This is the only scenario in which a Florida head of family loses wage protection to an ordinary creditor, and it is comparatively rare because the formal waiver requirements are seldom satisfied in everyday consumer agreements.

Not head of family

Finally, a single debtor with no dependents does not get the head-of-family exemption at all. They fall under the federal formula: a creditor may garnish the lesser of twenty-five percent of disposable earnings or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed thirty times the federal minimum wage. With the federal minimum wage at seven dollars and twenty-five cents an hour, that protected floor works out to about two hundred seventeen dollars and fifty cents a week. So a non-head-of-family worker earning eight hundred dollars in disposable pay would typically see roughly two hundred dollars garnished – the twenty-five-percent figure, since it is the lesser of the two limits.

Head of Family vs. Everyone Else

Florida protection compared to the bare federal rule.

SituationGoverning RuleWhat an Ordinary Creditor Can ReachKey Condition
Head of family, at or below thresholdFla. Stat. 222.11Nothing – wages fully exemptDisposable earnings of seven hundred fifty dollars per week or less
Head of family, above threshold, no waiverFla. Stat. 222.11Nothing – the excess is still exemptNo valid written consent on file
Head of family, above threshold, valid waiver222.11 plus federal capThe over-threshold portion, capped federallyProperly formatted written agreement
Not head of familyFederal (15 U.S.C. 1673)Lesser of twenty-five percent or pay over thirty times minimum wageNo qualifying dependents
Child or spousal supportFederal support rulesUp to fifty to sixty-five percent of disposable paySupport order, not an ordinary debt

The pattern is unmistakable: for the great majority of working parents in Florida, an ordinary judgment creditor simply cannot use wage garnishment at all. That is why a Florida judgment so often comes down to assets the exemption does not cover – and why knowing exactly where the debtor banks and works decides the case. Where the wage route is closed, the next move is to confirm employment for a wage garnishment only when the debtor is the rare non-exempt earner, and otherwise to locate bank accounts and other reachable property.

When Wages Are Off Limits, Creditors Pivot

The exemption protects the paycheck – not everything the debtor owns.

The head-of-family exemption is powerful but specific: it protects earnings. It does not turn the debtor into a fortress. A creditor blocked at the payroll department will redirect the same writ-of-garnishment machinery toward property the statute does not shield, and that is where most Florida collection actually happens.

The first pivot is usually the bank account. Wages that have been deposited can in some circumstances keep their exempt character for a window of time when they can be traced and identified as exempt earnings, but money commingled with other funds, or money that is not earnings at all, is exposed to an account garnishment. The second pivot is non-exempt personal property and real estate – though Florida’s constitutional homestead protection shields the debtor’s primary residence with no dollar cap, which is a separate and famous layer of Florida asset protection. A creditor who understands which assets are exempt and which are exposed wastes far less effort. The flip side – what a debtor can lawfully keep – is covered in our guide to Florida asset exemptions from creditors.

Timing matters too, because a judgment is not collectible forever in theory but is enforceable for a long time in practice. A Florida money judgment is generally enforceable for twenty years, with judgment liens requiring periodic renewal to keep their priority. That long runway is one reason patient, well-targeted asset location beats a rushed wage garnishment that the exemption was always going to defeat. How long a creditor has to sue in the first place is a different clock, addressed in our overview of the Florida debt-collection statute of limitations.

Why Florida Garnishments Fall Apart

The usual reasons a valid judgment still collects nothing.

Debtor Is Head of Family

The single most common dead end – the exemption shields the entire paycheck and the writ returns empty.

Wrong Employer on File

The writ goes to a past job; the debtor changed employers and the paperwork chases a paycheck that no longer exists.

Self-Employed or Paid in Cash

No conventional payroll to serve, so the wage route never opens and the search has to shift to accounts and assets.

Unknown Bank

An account garnishment needs the right institution and branch; guessing wrong tips off the debtor and freezes nothing.

Missed the Exemption Fight

The debtor files a claim of exemption and the creditor, unprepared, lets the writ dissolve by default.

Debtor Left the State

The job and the bank moved with them, raising domestication and out-of-state collection questions on top of the locate.

The Florida Writ-of-Garnishment Procedure

From judgment to a served garnishee, step by step.

1

Win and Hold a Judgment

A garnishment is a post-judgment remedy. The creditor must already hold a valid Florida money judgment – or a foreign judgment domesticated in Florida – before any writ can issue.

2

Motion and Writ Issue

The creditor files a motion for a writ of garnishment under Chapter 77, identifying the garnishee – the employer or bank that holds the debtor’s wages or money – and the clerk issues the writ.

3

Garnishee Answers, Debtor Is Noticed

The writ is served on the garnishee, who must answer stating what it holds. The debtor must then be served with notice and the claim-of-exemption form explaining their rights.

4

Exemption Window Runs

The debtor has twenty days to file a claim of exemption. If they do and the creditor does not timely object, the writ is dissolved and the funds released; if not, the held amount is paid over.

The procedure is exacting on purpose. After a debtor files a claim of exemption and request for hearing, the creditor has a short window – measured in business days and varying with how the claim was delivered – to file an objection, and a failure to object means the writ dissolves without a hearing. Where a plaintiff’s underlying allegations are materially disputed, a debtor may also be directed to move to dissolve the writ within twenty days of the certificate of service. The lesson for creditors is that a Florida garnishment is won or lost on the calendar as much as on the merits, and the head-of-family claim is the defense that arrives most often.

Support and Tax: Different Rules Entirely

The head-of-family shield does not stop every kind of garnishment.

It would be a mistake to read section 222.11 as making a Florida paycheck untouchable. The exemption protects against ordinary creditors – the medical bill, the credit card, the personal judgment. It does not override the categories of debt that federal and state law treat as special.

Child and spousal support can reach a far larger share of disposable earnings than any commercial creditor. Under the federal framework that Florida follows for income withholding, a support order can capture up to roughly half of disposable earnings when the obligor is supporting another spouse or child, and up to about sixty-five percent in some arrearage situations. The head-of-family exemption simply does not apply to a support obligation. Likewise, unpaid federal taxes and certain other government debts – federal student loans, for instance – follow their own administrative collection rules and are not blocked by the Florida exemption. When people ask why their neighbor’s wages are being garnished in Florida “even with kids,” the answer is almost always that the debt is support, taxes, or another carve-out rather than an ordinary judgment.

This is also where the federal ceiling stays relevant for the non-exempt debtor. The federal Consumer Credit Protection Act caps ordinary garnishment at the lesser of twenty-five percent of disposable earnings or the amount over thirty times the federal minimum wage, at 15 U.S.C. section 1673, and Florida’s exemption is read on top of, not instead of, that federal floor. The state head-of-family rule itself lives in Florida Statute section 222.11.

How the Exemption Is Claimed and Proven

The protection is powerful, but it is asserted, not automatic.

One point trips up debtors and creditors alike: the head-of-family exemption does not enforce itself. A debtor who simply ignores a garnishment can lose protected wages by default, because the statute puts the burden on the person claiming the exemption to assert it on time. When the writ is served, the debtor receives a claim-of-exemption form, and it is the timely filing of that form – within the twenty-day window – that actually invokes the shield. Miss the deadline and even fully exempt earnings can be paid over to the creditor. For a creditor, this means a garnishment is never hopeless on paper; the question is whether the debtor will recognize and assert the defense in time.

When the claim is contested, the debtor is generally expected to come forward with proof of head-of-family status – documentation that they provide more than half the support of a child or dependent. Tax returns claiming the dependent, school or childcare records, household expense records, and an affidavit are the kinds of evidence courts look for. A creditor who suspects the status is overstated – for example, where two adults each claim to head the same household, or where the “dependent” is not actually supported – can challenge it, and the court resolves the dispute. This is why the seemingly simple word “family” generates so much real litigation in Florida garnishment practice.

Common misunderstandings

Three myths cause the most wasted effort. The first is that Florida bans wage garnishment outright; it does not – it strongly limits garnishment of a head of family’s wages, while non-exempt debtors and support and tax obligations remain fully reachable. The second is that the seven-hundred-fifty-dollar figure is a percentage cap like the federal rule; it is not – below the line the exemption is total, and above the line the excess is still exempt absent a written waiver. The third is that depositing a paycheck into a bank account automatically launders away the protection; it does not, because exempt earnings that can be traced and identified may retain their exempt character for a period after deposit, though commingling with other funds erodes that protection. Sorting myth from rule is exactly what separates a Florida garnishment that collects from one that quietly dissolves.

Why Collection Here Is a Locate Problem

The law is settled; the facts are what you have to find.

Step back from the statute and the practical shape of Florida judgment collection comes into focus. Because the head-of-family exemption blocks the wage route for so many debtors, the cases that actually pay out are the ones where the creditor knows the facts on the ground: the rare non-exempt employer to garnish, the bank account that can be reached, the rental property or business interest that the exemption never covered. None of that is a legal question. It is an information question, and information is exactly what stale court files do not contain.

This is the work we do. As a public-records research firm, we locate a debtor’s current employer, identify likely depository institutions, surface real property and registered assets, and confirm a current address for service of the writ and notice – all from public records and licensed databases, used for the lawful purpose of enforcing a valid judgment. We are not lawyers and we do not file your writ; we hand your attorney or your collections team the verified facts that decide where a garnishment is worth serving and where it would only tip off the debtor. The same methodology underpins our broader skip tracing services, and when employment is the specific question, our guide on how to find someone’s current employer walks through the approach. For a legitimate judgment-enforcement matter, a verified locate typically comes back within 24 hours.

Who We Help

We do the locate; you enforce the judgment.

Collection Attorneys

Employers and assets located for enforcement

Judgment Creditors

Reachable property identified before the writ

Debt Buyers

Current employment and banks verified

Small-Claims Winners

Self-represented and trying to actually collect

Landlords

Former tenants traced for damage judgments

Process Servers

Verified addresses so the writ is served right

Whoever you are, the wall in Florida is the same: a valid judgment is worthless if the wage route is blocked and you cannot find the assets that are not. We locate the current employer, the likely bank, the real property, and a serviceable address through lawful public-records research, and we document what we find so your filing rests on verified facts rather than a guess. It pairs naturally with our state-by-state reference on wage garnishment laws by state for creditors chasing a debtor who crossed a line on the map. We do not give legal advice or file your writ – we make sure the facts behind it are real.

Our Commitment

We find what makes a Florida judgment collectible – a current employer where the exemption does not apply, the likely bank, the non-exempt assets, and a serviceable address – or a documented record when the trail runs cold. Lawful, court-ready public-records research for creditors, collection attorneys, and judgment holders since 2004.

People Locator Skip Tracing Investigation Team – a public-records research firm conducting skip tracing and people-locating since 2004, working public records and licensed sources lawfully and for legitimate purposes only. Last reviewed 2026. This page is general information about Florida law, not legal advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can wages be garnished in Florida at all?

Yes, but Florida is one of the most protective states. An ordinary judgment creditor can garnish a debtor who is not head of family under the federal formula. A debtor who is head of family with disposable earnings of seven hundred fifty dollars a week or less is fully exempt, and earnings above that figure are exempt too unless the debtor agreed in writing.

Who qualifies as head of family under Fla. Stat. 222.11?

Any natural person who provides more than one-half of the support for a child or other dependent. It is a support test rather than a marital-status test, so single parents and primary earners can qualify. Only one person may claim the status for the same dependents, so two spouses cannot both shield wages on the same child.

What is the seven-hundred-fifty-dollar weekly threshold?

It is the line in section 222.11. A head of family whose disposable earnings are seven hundred fifty dollars a week or less has all of those earnings exempt from garnishment by an ordinary creditor. Earnings above that weekly figure remain exempt as well unless the debtor signed a valid written agreement allowing the garnishment.

Can a debtor waive the head-of-family exemption?

Only through a narrow, formal written agreement. To be valid the consent generally must be a separate document attached to the underlying contract, in the same language, and printed in at least fourteen-point type in substantially the statutory form. Most ordinary consumer debts have no qualifying waiver, so the exemption usually stands.

How much can be garnished if the debtor is not head of family?

The federal cap applies: the lesser of twenty-five percent of disposable earnings or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed thirty times the federal minimum wage. With the minimum wage at seven dollars and twenty-five cents an hour, that protected floor is about two hundred seventeen dollars and fifty cents a week.

How long does a debtor have to claim an exemption?

Twenty days. After a writ of garnishment issues and the debtor is served with notice, the debtor must file a claim of exemption within twenty days. If the debtor claims an exemption and the creditor does not timely object, the writ is dissolved and the held wages or funds are released.

Does the exemption stop child support or tax garnishment?

No. The head-of-family exemption protects against ordinary creditors only. Child and spousal support can reach roughly half to sixty-five percent of disposable earnings under federal rules, and unpaid federal taxes and federal student loans follow their own administrative collection rules that the Florida exemption does not block.

If wages are exempt, how do creditors collect in Florida?

They pivot to assets the exemption does not cover – bank accounts holding non-exempt funds, non-exempt personal property, and real estate other than the constitutionally protected homestead. Because a judgment is enforceable for about twenty years, locating the right employer, bank, and assets is usually what decides whether a creditor ever collects.

Holding a Florida Judgment You Can’t Collect?

We locate the current employer, the likely bank, and the non-exempt assets that decide whether a Florida garnishment is worth serving – lawful public-records research with a verified locate typically within 24 hours. Contact us to get started.

Start Your Request →