Where Connecticut Keeps the Records That Locate a Person
Connecticut is generous about what it lets the public search. You can look a case up by party name, by an attorney’s juris number, or – for evictions and foreclosures – by the property address itself. Then Connecticut takes it back. Civil cases come off the Judicial Branch website between one and ten years after disposition. An eviction that was withdrawn, dismissed or decided for the tenant comes off thirty days later – though one the landlord won is not removed at all. Convictions come off after ten years, and thousands are being erased outright by operation of law, at which point the statute says the person is “deemed to have never been arrested” and may swear as much under oath. Connecticut then reaches past its own filing cabinet and orders commercial background-screening databases to delete what the court erased. So a blank Connecticut result tells you almost nothing on its own, and the skill here is knowing which silence you are looking at. Public records and licensed data are the only inputs used, and the lawful reason is written down before a file opens. General information about Connecticut records practice, not legal advice.
What Connecticut Lets You Search, Including the Property Address Itself
Start with the generosity, because it is real and it is underused.
The Connecticut Judicial Branch describes its Case Look-up as covering “Supreme and Appellate, civil, family, criminal, motor vehicle, housing, and small claims cases”. No account, no fee, no vendor in between. Read against states that route the public to paid intermediaries, that is a strong starting position.
The entry points, taken off the Civil, Family, Housing and Small Claims look-up itself, are where it gets interesting:
- By Party Name. The Branch’s own guidance says you may enter part of a name – “SMITH or SMI in the Last Name field” returns everything beginning with those letters. Partial-name searching is not always allowed elsewhere and it matters when a spelling is uncertain.
- By Docket Number. Each begins with a three-letter location code identifying the court, then two letters for case type, then the filing year.
- By Attorney or Firm Juris Number – every case in which that attorney or firm has filed an appearance. There is also a separate attorney look-up that returns licensing and disciplinary history.
- By Property Address, for summary process and foreclosure matters. Searching a court index by address inverts the normal problem: instead of asking what a person’s address is, you can ask what happened at an address you already have.
Alongside those sit a housing session look-up, centralised small claims, court events by date, legal notices, and a pending foreclosure sales list broken out by town. Between the address search and the town-by-town foreclosure list, there is a substantial body of property-linked court data in public view here, and a Connecticut file should be using both.
One quirk that quietly loses cases
Worth knowing before you conclude that somebody has no Connecticut history. The Branch warns that punctuation is not normalised: “you would enter O’Connor (with the apostrophe) in the Last Name field and get a list of cases, and then enter OConnor (without the apostrophe), and get a different list of cases. The system search looks for an exact match, and the results of your search can be different depending upon how the name was entered in the system when the case was filed.” Any Irish, Italian or Portuguese surname in this state has to be run both ways, and we run them both ways as a matter of routine rather than discovering the gap afterwards.
The Short Version
Connecticut skip tracing turns on the fact that a Connecticut record has a lifespan. The Judicial Branch’s Case Look-up is free and broad, including a search by property address. Then the display policy takes it back. Civil, family, housing and small claims cases show for one to ten years after disposition; a withdrawn, dismissed or tenant-won eviction comes off in thirty days; convictions show for no more than ten years; and erased records legally cease to exist, even inside screening databases. A blank Connecticut result is not evidence of a blank history. Our side of it: public records and licensed data only, a lawful reason recorded in writing before the file opens, and general information here rather than legal advice.
The Removal Schedule, Which Is Published and Which Nobody Reads
Five different clocks, all running, none of them announced in the result you get.
The governing document is the Judicial Branch’s Display of Case Information on the Judicial Branch Website, last revised on the first of July 2024. It is four pages long, it is linked from the bottom of every look-up page, and it is the most consequential thing on the site.
Civil, family, housing and small claims
The rule: “Case information is generally shown on this website for a period of one to ten years after the disposition date unless the Court Rules found in Sections 7-10 and 7-11 of the Connecticut Practice Book provide for a shorter period of time.” Two refinements follow that change how a result should be read. Cases are removed one month before the end of the applicable period – so the last month of any window is already dark. And “if a motion is filed in a case after its disposition date, the time a case is displayed may be extended for 11 more months“, which means a case can reappear in effect, or persist longer than its class would suggest, because somebody filed something.
Some evictions come off in thirty days – and the word “some” is the whole point
Separately, and much faster: “Pursuant to section 47a-26j of the Connecticut General Statutes, certain eviction cases will be removed from this website 30 days after disposition or other final activity of the case.” The disclaimer does not say which ones. The statute does, and almost every summary of it we have read online drops the condition and inverts the meaning.
Section 47a-26j(a) requires the Judicial Department to remove a summary process record within thirty days of one of three events, and only those three: “(1) the withdrawal of such action, (2) a judgment of dismissal or nonsuit of such action upon any grounds, or (3) a final disposition of such action that includes a judgment for the defendant.” The defendant in a summary process action is the tenant. A case that ended in a judgment for the landlord is not removed at all – it stays on the site under the ordinary display rules, like any other housing case.
That reverses the practical conclusion most guidance draws, and it reverses it in the direction that matters to the people who send us this work. If you are looking for evictions somebody lost, the thirty-day clock is not your problem; those judgments remain visible and searchable by property address. If you are reconstructing a tenancy history, it is very much your problem, because the cases that vanish are precisely the ones that ended without a judgment against the tenant – and their absence is not evidence they never happened. Subsection (b) runs the other way: where there is later activity in a removed case, or the case outlives its removal date because of an appeal, the Branch restores or retains it, and it then displays for thirty days after the final disposition or for the original period, whichever is later. Public Act 23-207 made the section effective on the first of July 2024 and applied it to summary process actions disposed of before that date as well as after, so the removals reach backwards through the docket. If the tenancy history you need has already left the site, order a Connecticut skip trace and we work the town land records and the party and property indexes that are still inside their windows.
Two subsections that describe the data trade directly
The same section governs what anybody may do with a record once it has come off, and these are the two most on-point Connecticut provisions for anyone buying bulk court data. Subsection (c) keeps a removed summary process record out of “any sale or transfer of bulk case records by the Judicial Department to any person or entity purchasing such records for any commercial purpose” – the removed cases are not supposed to be in the feed in the first place. Subsection (d) binds everybody downstream of it: “No person or entity shall, for any commercial purpose, disclose any record or identifying information concerning any summary process action that has been removed from the Judicial Department’s Internet web site pursuant to subsection (a).” The section then defines commercial purpose broadly enough to catch this industry outright – individual or bulk sale, “the making of consumer reports containing any such record or information”, “any use related to screening any prospective tenant”, and any other use for pecuniary gain – while carving out governmental, scholarly, educational, journalistic and other noncommercial use. So a tenant-screening file still showing a withdrawn or dismissed Connecticut eviction is not merely stale. Disclosing it for that purpose is the thing subsection (d) prohibits.
Protected matters may never appear
“Cases for relief from physical abuse, foreign protective orders, and motions that would be likely to publicly reveal the identity or location of a protected party may not be shown on the website under the Federal Violence Against Women Act of 2005 but may be available only at the court.” That is a federal overlay on a state website, and it is deliberate. We treat it as dispositive rather than as an obstacle, for reasons set out further down this page.
Criminal and motor vehicle
Convictions display for “no more than 10 years after the date of sentencing” unless Practice Book section 7-13 sets something shorter, and again the removal happens a month early. Four exclusions are stated outright: youthful offender cases, juvenile cases, and infractions and violation convictions are not shown; and while unvacated forfeitures of bail appear in motor vehicle cases, they do not appear in non-motor-vehicle cases.
Then the Branch adds a caution that reads differently once you know about Clean Slate: “Criminal history record information shown on this site may change daily due to erasures, corrections, pardons, and other modifications to individual criminal history record information.”
And the Branch’s own warning about the use people put it to
Stated plainly in the same document: “The information on the case look-up pages is not the official record of the court and should not be used as a substitute for a criminal background check.” We quote that rather than paraphrase it, because a great deal of published guidance to Connecticut records treats the look-up as exactly that substitute.
Watch: Reading a Connecticut Blank
Why an empty result in this state has at least four possible meanings.
Watch Overview
Erasure, and the Statute That Reaches Into Private Databases
Above the display rules sits a body of law under which the record stops existing.
Chapter 961a of the Connecticut General Statutes is titled, simply, Criminal Records. It is the reason a Connecticut criminal history behaves the way it does, and no Connecticut result can be read without it.
What gets erased, and when
Section 54-142a erases police and court records where the accused is found not guilty or the charge is dismissed; where a charge has been nolled and thirteen months have elapsed; and where an absolute pardon has been granted. Those are longstanding. What changed recently is that Connecticut now erases convictions too, automatically.
Under the Clean Slate provisions at section 54-142a(e), the clocks are these:
- Seven years from the date of the most recent judgment of conviction, for a classified or unclassified misdemeanour or a motor vehicle violation carrying a maximum of not more than one year – except a violation of section 14-227a, operating under the influence.
- Ten years for a class D or E felony, an unclassified felony carrying not more than five years, a motor vehicle violation carrying more than one and not more than five years, and for section 14-227a, which the statute moves onto the longer track.
- Erasure happens by operation of law where the offence occurred on or after the first of January 2000, and on petition where it occurred earlier.
Two categories are held back by section 54-142a(e)(2), and the choice is deliberate: any conviction on or after the first of January 2000 designated a family violence crime under section 46b-38a, and any nonviolent sexual offence or sexually violent offence as defined in section 54-250, are not eligible for automatic erasure at all.
The legal effect is total
The statute does not say the record is hidden. It says: “Any person who shall have been the subject of such an erasure shall be deemed to have never been arrested within the meaning of the general statutes with respect to the proceedings so erased and may so swear under oath.“
And section 54-142c closes the loop on anybody still holding a copy: the clerk of the court, any person charged with retention and control of erased records, and any criminal justice agency holding information from them “shall not disclose to anyone the existence of such erased records or information pertaining to any charge erased”.
Section 54-142e – the duty Connecticut put on the data industry
An erasure provision that stopped at the state’s own filing cabinet would leave the commercial copies untouched. Section 54-142e does not stop there. The heading of section 54-142e reads, in part, “Duty of consumer reporting agency or background screening provider to update and delete erased criminal records“, and the body is as direct as the heading.
Any entity – “including, but not limited to, a consumer reporting agency or background screening provider or similar data-based service or company” – that has purchased records or filed a mass request for Connecticut criminal matters of public record must, before disclosing them, do two things: purchase updated erasure information “on a monthly basis” or on whatever schedule the Department sets, and “update its records of criminal matters of public record to permanently delete such erased records not later than thirty calendar days after receipt of information on the erasure”.
If an erased record is disclosed more than thirty days after that notice, subsection (c) lets the Attorney General order its removal within five business days. And subsection (e) provides that “any violation of any provision of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice“. The background-screening language and the thirty-day deadline took effect on the first of January 2023; the mass-request language, the Attorney General’s removal power and the trade-practice provision followed on the first of July 2023.
What that means for anything you buy
This is the practical conclusion the rest of the page rests on. Connecticut criminal-record data obtained from a commercial aggregator is presumptively stale unless that aggregator is buying monthly erasure updates and deleting on the thirty-day clock. The statute exists precisely because they did not all do so. A Connecticut hit from a bulk database is therefore a lead to verify at the court, never a finding to report – and a Connecticut miss from the same database is worth even less.
The rollout itself has been uneven, which the State says openly. Its own Clean Slate portal reports that erasures “have now resumed after months of delay due to aging data systems and inaccurate data quality”, that approximately fifty thousand people have had records partially or completely erased, and that it expects erasures for more than one hundred thousand. Connecticut says it has spent more than five million dollars automating the systems, and runs a separate cannabis erasure programme alongside. A record that was visible last quarter may not be visible this quarter, and the reverse is possible too where a delayed erasure has only now caught up.
Two Things We Will Not Do, and One Connecticut Wrote For Us
In this state the not-a-screening-agency line is not a disclaimer. It is a statutory category with duties attached.
Not a consumer reporting agency and not a background screening provider
Section 54-142e names two kinds of company and puts a continuing legal duty on both: consumer reporting agencies and background screening providers, plus any “similar data-based service or company” buying Connecticut criminal records in bulk. People Locator Skip Tracing is neither of those, and does not issue consumer reports. That is a boundary worth stating precisely here rather than generically, because Connecticut has legislated about the category we are declining to occupy.
The consequence is a set of uses that are closed to anything produced here, in your hands as much as ours. Nothing from this desk may decide whether somebody is granted a tenancy in Stamford or Waterbury, whether they are hired or promoted, whether credit is advanced, or what an insurer charges them. Tenant screening and employment vetting are the two requests that arrive most often and both fall wholly outside the work. The law channels each of those through a regulated product instead – one that must carry adverse-action notices and give the person it describes a way to contest it – and Connecticut then layers the section 54-142e deletion duty on top of the companies supplying that product. A locate report is neither the regulated product nor a supplier of it, and nothing about how it is ordered or paid for changes that. Connecticut landlords and lenders reach us at the far end of a matter – after somebody has gone, after a balance exists. If instead you are holding an application and deciding what to do about it, we are not the right call at all, and saying so costs us a job we should not have taken.
No manufactured reason for being handed a record
Connecticut publishes its look-ups to the general public without an account, which means the public route and our route are the same route. What is inside a bank or brokerage account is not obtained here and not reported; where a matter truly requires it, the instrument is a subpoena or a court order your attorney seeks. The lawful reason for a Connecticut search is written into the file at the moment it opens, so the question of why the research happened has a documented answer rather than a recollection. Where the underlying question is how long a claim has left to run, that is general legal information and sits with the Connecticut debt collection statute of limitations.
Where a Connecticut Fact Lives, and How Long It Stays There
The right-hand column is the clock, because in this state the clock is the thing that catches people.
Most routing tables answer “which office”. A Connecticut routing table has to answer “which office, and for how long”, because the second answer is what turns a correct search into an empty one.
| What you want | Where it sits | The clock on it |
|---|---|---|
| An eviction or summary process case | Judicial Branch housing session look-up, searchable by property address 30 Days | Off the website thirty days after withdrawal, dismissal or nonsuit, or a final disposition including a judgment for the tenant, under section 47a-26j(a). A judgment for the landlord is not removed. |
| A civil, family or small claims case | Superior Court case look-up, by party name or docket | One to ten years after disposition, removed a month early; a post-disposition motion can extend it eleven months. |
| A criminal conviction | Criminal and motor vehicle look-up | No more than ten years after sentencing, and subject to erasure before that. |
| A juvenile or youthful offender matter, or an infraction | Not on the website at all | Never displayed. Absence here means nothing whatever about what exists. |
| A case involving a protected party | May be at the court only | Withheld from the website under the federal Violence Against Women Act of 2005. |
| Anything erased under chapter 961a | Legally nowhere | Holders may not disclose that it exists, and the subject is deemed never arrested. |
| Which cases an attorney is running | Attorney or firm juris number look-up | Follows the underlying case display rules, so the same windows apply. |
| Foreclosure activity in a town | Pending foreclosure sales list, broken out by town | Forward-looking rather than historical – it lists what is scheduled, not what has passed. |
| A residential address for a Safe at Home participant | Nowhere reachable | Every participant shares one fictitious Hartford address, and we do not go behind it. |
Six Connecticut Searches That Return a Confident Nothing
Every one of these produces a clean empty screen that means something other than “no record”.
A Withdrawn Eviction Searched in Week Six
Withdrawn, dismissed and tenant-won cases leave the site after thirty days. The tenancy still happened.
A Name Run Without Its Apostrophe
The Branch says exact match. O’Neill and ONeill return different lists, and only one was checked.
An Aggregator Trusted on Criminal Data
Section 54-142e exists because bulk holders were slow to delete. A stale hit and a stale miss are equally likely.
The Last Month of a Display Window
Cases come off a month before the period actually ends, so the final stretch is dark by design.
An Infraction Expected to Show
Infractions, violations, juvenile and youthful offender matters are never published. Nothing can be inferred.
A Hartford Address Taken at Face Value
One fictitious street address is shared by every protected participant. It is a flag, not a residence.
A Small State With Short Moves and Long Consequences
Distance is not the difficulty here. Timing is.
Connecticut is compact enough that almost any move within it is a short one, and that changes what an address history means. A person who leaves New Haven for Hamden, or Hartford for East Hartford, has usually not changed employer, school district catchment or anything else that generates a fresh paper trail. The move produces very little new record, which is the opposite of the problem in a large state where a move produces plenty of record in a place nobody thought to look.
What that means in practice is that Connecticut files are won on recency and record type rather than on geographic breadth. Searching the whole state is cheap; the question is whether the document you need is still displayed. It also inverts the usual advice about locating a missing person, which is written for states where the answer is to widen the radius: here the useful question is almost never which town to add but which month a record was still inside its display window, so the work runs on dates and case classes instead of on distance. This is why the display schedule above is not a footnote on this page but its spine.
The county names still exist. The counties do not.
Worth being precise about, because county-keyed data products still use these names and people reasonably assume there is an office behind them. Taking the Census Bureau’s 2020 national county file and filtering to Connecticut returns eight entries – Fairfield County, Hartford County, Litchfield County, Middlesex County, New Haven County, New London County, Tolland County and Windham County – and every one of them carries class code H4, which the Bureau’s class-code list defines as “An inactive county or equivalent feature”. Compare Colorado or Georgia, where the equivalent entries are class H1, “An active county or equivalent feature”.
So a Connecticut county is a label on a map and a field in a dataset, not a government with a courthouse or a recorder. There is no Fairfield County clerk to telephone and no New Haven County recorder of deeds. Requests routed to a county here do not arrive somewhere slowly; they do not arrive at all. The court layer is organised by judicial district and housing session, and the land layer sits with the towns.
Two structural points do bear on a search and are worth holding. First, the court layer and the recording layer are separate systems with separate rules, and the Judicial Branch’s display policy governs only the former – a land record does not vanish because a case did. That asymmetry makes an asset search behind a judgment the durable half of Connecticut work, because the town land records carry no display window at all: a mortgage, a release or a judgment lien recorded with the town clerk is still readable years after the case that produced it left the Branch’s site on schedule. Second, Connecticut’s three largest urban centres each behave as their own housing market with their own summary process volume, and we cover them at metro level in their own right: Bridgeport and the southwestern corridor and the Hartford area each have their own page, where the town-by-town detail lives.
Third, and easily forgotten on a small map: Connecticut’s southwestern corner is functionally part of the New York metropolitan area, and its eastern edge runs into Rhode Island within an easy commute. A person who has “left Connecticut” may have moved a distance that would not count as a move anywhere else in the country. Where a last known address sits near either line, the neighbouring state goes into the first pass rather than being held back. The general approach to placing somebody in this state sits on our finding someone in Connecticut page.
How a Connecticut File Is Sequenced
Date the question first, because in this state the answer depends on when you ask it.
Establish What Should Still Be Visible
Before searching, we work out which display windows are open for the period in question. That converts a future blank from a mystery into an expected result.
Run the Name Every Way It Is Spelled
Partial strings, and every punctuation variant, because the Branch states the match is exact and an apostrophe alone produces a different list.
Search the Address, Not Only the Person
Where an address is known, the summary process and foreclosure index is queried by property. It answers a question about a place that a name search cannot.
Classify Every Silence Before Reporting It
An empty result is labelled as withdrawn on schedule, never published, possibly erased, or genuinely absent. Those are four different findings and the report says which.
Safe at Home, and the Address That Does Not Exist
Connecticut invented a street address in Hartford and gave the same one to everybody it protects.
Connecticut runs Safe at Home, its Address Confidentiality Program, through the Secretary of the State, and it has been in operation since the first of January 2004. Eligibility, as the office enumerates it, covers victims of family violence; injury or risk of injury to a child; kidnapping; sexual assault; stalking; trafficking in persons; and child abuse or neglect substantiated by the Department of Children and Families where it was the basis for a restraining order or civil protection order.
Two features of how it works deserve to be understood by anybody doing records research in this state, because they are unusual and because misreading them causes real harm.
The first: “The ACP address is a post office box, and a ‘fictitious’ street address located in Hartford, Connecticut.” The State’s own word is fictitious. It is not a forwarding office that happens to be in Hartford; it is a street address that does not correspond to anywhere the participant is.
The second, and the one that matters most: “All ACP participants use the same address.” Mail is routed by a certification code rather than by the address itself. Every protected person in Connecticut shares one address of record.
Put those together and the operational conclusion is unambiguous. That address, appearing on a Connecticut record or in a purchased data file, is a flag rather than a location. A commercial database that reports it as a residence is reporting something the State fabricated on purpose. When it surfaces on a file here, it does not open a new line of enquiry – it closes the file. We do not attempt to establish which participant it belongs to, do not approach the Secretary of the State’s office to narrow it, and do not treat the shared nature of the address as a puzzle to be solved. It is a decision the legislature made and we are not a workaround for it.
The Secretary of the State also acts as each participant’s legal agent for process, receipt and forwarding of mail, and may not release anything from a participant’s file beyond the program address except on written request from the head of a law enforcement agency or the State Elections Enforcement Commission, on a court order, or where certification has been cancelled.
The category Connecticut deliberately held back
There is a second signal in the erasure statute and it points the same way. When Connecticut built automatic conviction erasure, it excluded convictions designated as family violence crimes from the sweep. The legislature chose to let those remain visible while clearing decades of other convictions. A firm reading that alongside a fictitious shared address should not need further guidance about which requests this state expects to be refused.
If you are the person such a search would be aimed at
You are in the wrong place and we would rather say so than take anything from you. The routes that exist are Safe at Home itself – applications are made through a community-based domestic violence or sexual assault crisis programme, with an application assistant, rather than directly – and the court that can issue or extend a protective order. This firm has no role in Safe at Home, no standing to counsel anybody on staying safe, and no expertise in either; both of those belong with the crisis programme and with the court. Nothing written above is instructions for protecting yourself, and it should not be read as though it were.
Where court-connected work still stands
A marshal or server holding a Connecticut docket number, a named party and an attorney behind the request is doing something the court set in motion, and Connecticut itself provides for that: the Secretary of the State receives process on a participant’s behalf. Connecticut has effectively answered the question in advance by naming an agent to receive process, because the lawful route to a participant runs through the Secretary of the State and does not require anybody to know where they sleep. A request that this route would satisfy was never really a locating request. A request that this route would not satisfy is asking for precisely the thing the programme was built to withhold. Which of the two has arrived is established in writing before any Connecticut file is opened. Putting a located debtor in front of an enforcement officer is covered separately in our note on enforcing a Connecticut judgment.
Who Sends Us Connecticut Work
Six recurring requests, and the Connecticut clock each one runs against.
Counsel Chasing a Window
Pulling a case before its display period closes a month early
Holders of a Judgment
Recorded instruments that outlast the case that produced them
Marshals Serving Papers
A current address confirmed before a return is attempted
Estates and Their Heirs
Probate and land records that no display clock touches
Lenders Post-Default
A balance that already exists, never an application in progress
Landlords After Move-Out
Judgments for the landlord stay up; withdrawn and dismissed cases do not
What a Connecticut Report Commits To
Every empty result is classified rather than left blank. A Connecticut report distinguishes between a record that was withdrawn on schedule, a category the Judicial Branch never publishes, something that may have been erased under chapter 961a, and a genuine absence – because those carry entirely different weight and reporting them identically would mislead. Anything sourced from a commercial aggregator is labelled as such, with the caution that erased Connecticut records are meant to be deleted from those files within thirty days and are not always. Each finding names the office it came from and the date it was read, so it can be pulled again without us. Public records and lawfully licensed data are the only inputs that reach it, and no file is opened until its lawful reason has been written down. That has been the standard at this firm since 2004.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do Connecticut court cases stay on the Judicial Branch website?
It depends on the case type and there are several clocks. Under the Branch’s published display policy, civil, family, housing and small claims cases are generally shown for one to ten years after the disposition date, unless Practice Book sections 7-10 and 7-11 set something shorter, and they come off the site a month before that period ends. Convictions are shown for no more than ten years after sentencing, subject to Practice Book section 7-13. A summary process case is removed thirty days after it is withdrawn, dismissed or nonsuited, or after a final disposition that includes a judgment for the defendant tenant, under section 47a-26j(a) of the General Statutes – but an eviction that ended in a judgment for the landlord is not removed at all. And if a motion is filed after disposition, a civil case may display for eleven months longer than it otherwise would.
Can you search Connecticut court records by address?
Yes, for summary process and foreclosure matters, and it is one of the more useful things the state offers. The Judicial Branch’s civil, family, housing and small claims look-up includes a search by property address alongside searches by party name, docket number and attorney or firm juris number. There is also a pending foreclosure sales list broken out by town. Being able to ask what happened at an address, rather than only what address a person has, answers questions a name search structurally cannot.
What is Connecticut’s Clean Slate law and what does it erase?
It erases eligible convictions automatically rather than on application. Under section 54-142a(e), records of a misdemeanour or a motor vehicle violation carrying not more than a year are erased seven years from the most recent judgment of conviction, except operating under the influence under section 14-227a. Class D and E felonies, unclassified felonies carrying not more than five years, motor vehicle violations carrying between one and five years, and section 14-227a violations are erased at ten years. Erasure is automatic where the offence occurred on or after the first of January 2000 and requires a petition where it occurred earlier. Family violence convictions from 2000 onward and sexual offences under section 54-250 are excluded.
Does a background check company have to delete erased Connecticut records?
Yes. Section 54-142e places a duty on consumer reporting agencies, background screening providers and similar data-based services that buy Connecticut criminal records or file mass requests. Before disclosing anything they must purchase updated erasure information on a monthly basis or on the schedule the Department sets, and must permanently delete erased records within thirty calendar days of receiving notice of the erasure. If they disclose an erased record after that, the Attorney General may order removal within five business days, and a violation is deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice. It is why Connecticut criminal data from a bulk source should be treated as a lead rather than a finding.
If a Connecticut search comes back empty, does that mean there is no record?
No, and this is the single most common error in Connecticut research. An empty result is consistent with at least four different situations: the case existed and was withdrawn from display on schedule, the category is one the Branch never publishes at all, the record was erased under chapter 961a and legally no longer exists, or nothing was ever filed. Juvenile cases, youthful offender cases, infractions and violation convictions are never shown. Matters involving a protected party may be withheld under the federal Violence Against Women Act of 2005 and available only at the court. We classify which silence we are looking at rather than reporting a blank.
Why do I get different results searching the same Connecticut name twice?
Almost always punctuation. The Judicial Branch states that its party name search looks for an exact match, and gives its own example: entering O’Connor with the apostrophe returns one list of cases, and entering OConnor without it returns a different list, because results depend on how the name was typed when the case was filed. The search also accepts partial strings, so entering SMI returns everything beginning with those letters. Any name carrying an apostrophe, a hyphen or a space has to be run in every variant, which is a routine step here rather than an afterthought.
What should I know about how you work in Connecticut?
Surveillance, doorstep enquiries and cover stories are all outside it, and every route taken to a Connecticut clerk is one any member of the public could take unaided. We are also not a consumer reporting agency and not a background screening provider of the kind section 54-142e regulates, so nothing produced here may be used for tenancy, employment, credit or insurance decisions.
Can you locate someone enrolled in Connecticut’s Safe at Home program?
Eligibility covers victims of family violence, sexual assault, stalking, kidnapping, trafficking, and injury or risk of injury to a child. We do not attempt to work around any of it. We do not run surveillance.
Open a Connecticut File
Give us the name, any spelling variants you are aware of, whatever address history exists, and what the research is for. We will work out which display windows are still open before searching, run every punctuation variant because Connecticut matches names exactly, query the property index as well as the party index where an address is known, and classify every empty result as withdrawn, never-published, possibly erased or genuinely absent instead of handing you a blank. On a file with enough to work from, a first read normally reaches you within 24 hours. Want to test the question first? Get in touch and you will get a straight answer about whether Connecticut’s records are still likely to hold one.
Start Your Request →
