New Hampshire Debt Collection Statute of Limitations
New Hampshire does not sort unpaid obligations into a written-contract clock and an open-account clock. RSA 508:4, I gives all personal actions the same window – three years – and the longer periods sit in their own numbered sections that say so on their face. One number carries almost the whole chapter. This page walks RSA chapter 508 the way a New Hampshire creditor has to walk it: the single three-year period and the split that is simply not in the section text, the four places that period yields to something else, the thing no section of the chapter mentions anywhere, and RSA 508:9, which excludes a defendant’s time out of state from the count and so turns a limitations question into a question about where a person physically was. That last one is the part we can help with. Nobody at this firm holds a private investigator’s license; we work public records under a stated permissible purpose. General information, not legal advice.
Three Years, In Brief
RSA 508:4, I sets one limitations period for New Hampshire personal actions – three years of the act or omission complained of – together with a discovery rule for an injury that could not reasonably have been discovered when it happened. Read the section and you will notice what is absent: no written-instrument limb, no open-account limb, no separate category for a store card or a medical balance. Longer periods exist but they are quoted elsewhere. RSA 508:5 allows twenty years for actions of debt upon judgments, recognizances and contracts under seal. RSA 508:1 stands the whole chapter down wherever another statute fixes a different time. And nowhere in chapter 508 – not in the numbered sections, not in the lettered ones added since – is there an acknowledgment, new-promise or part-payment provision, so “did a payment restart it?” is not a question New Hampshire answers by statute. Where the record work matters is RSA 508:9: a defendant’s absence from and residence out of the state is excluded from the computation, which makes the debtor’s actual whereabouts a fact somebody has to establish. General information, not legal advice.
Watch: The New Hampshire Clock
How limitations shape collection strategy.
Watch Overview
One Clock. Three Years.
RSA 508:4, I – and the split that is not in it.
The operative sentence is short enough to read in one breath. RSA 508:4, I: “Except as otherwise provided by law, all personal actions, except actions for slander or libel, may be brought only within 3 years of the act or omission complained of, except that when the injury and its causal relationship to the act or omission were not discovered and could not reasonably have been discovered at the time of the act or omission, the action shall be commenced within 3 years of the time the plaintiff discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury and its causal relationship to the act or omission complained of.” The source note under it reads 1986, 227:12, eff. July 1, 1986, and the paragraph has stood in that form since.
Two words in that sentence do the heavy lifting: all personal actions. A suit on an unpaid revolving balance is a personal action. So is a suit on a signed installment note that is not under seal, a suit on a physician’s bill, and a suit on a handshake for landscaping work. They all sit inside the same three years. Nothing in the paragraph draws a line between a debt founded on a written instrument and a debt on an open or unwritten account, and there is no adjacent subsection that draws one either – a reader can confirm that in about ninety seconds by opening the text of RSA 508:4 at the New Hampshire General Court and looking for a limb that is not there.
That absence matters commercially, because the assumption runs the other way. A creditor whose collections policy was written around a six-year written-contract period, or who is working a portfolio that also contains accounts governed by longer periods in other jurisdictions, will over-value New Hampshire paper by years. Our overview of the debt collection statute of limitations by state shows how differently the neighbouring codes carve the same obligations up; the point here is only that New Hampshire did not carve at all in 508:4.
What RSA 508:4, I does not settle is when the three years began to run on a particular account. The paragraph fixes the period and supplies a discovery rule; it does not define the moment of accrual for a defaulted consumer balance, and the answer in a contested case comes from New Hampshire decisional law applied to the account history. That is a question for a New Hampshire attorney reading your file, not something to infer from a date field in a servicing record.
Where the Three Years Yields
Four displacements, each with a section number.
Because 508:4 is general, chapter 508 needs an explicit rule for when something more specific wins. It has one, and it is the first section in the chapter. RSA 508:1, Limitation of Chapter: “The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to cases in which a different time is limited by statute.” That single line is the doorway through which every specialised limitations period in the New Hampshire code walks. It is also the honest answer to the promissory-note question. The instinct is to reach for New Hampshire’s Article 3 figure and print it. We could not read New Hampshire’s Article 3 text at the General Court path we tried – the URL answers, but the body it serves reads “ERROR 404 – Page Not Found” – and this page does not print a number it has not read at source. Ask counsel to run 508:1 against the instrument in front of you.
Second, RSA 508:5, Specialties, which reaches three things and gives each of them twenty years running from accrual: an action of debt on a judgment, one on a recognizance, and one on a contract under seal. Three categories, one sentence – and the practical one for most creditors is the first. Read what that first category actually is, because it is easy to misread: 508:5 fixes the deadline for bringing a fresh action of debt upon a judgment, which is a second filing deadline. It does not say a New Hampshire judgment stays enforceable for twenty years. Enforcement is a separate clock kept in a separate chapter – RSA 511:55, I, for example, holds attached real or personal property only “until the expiration of 6 years from the time of rendering a judgment in the action in favor of the plaintiff on which he can take execution.” Three clocks, then, and they do not share a number: three years to sue on the debt, twenty years to sue on the resulting judgment, and enforcement windows set elsewhere again. What you may do with that judgment once you hold it – the writs, the periodic-payment machinery, the levy – belongs to our page on New Hampshire judgment collection rather than to this one, and the full text of the section is at RSA 508:5 on the General Court site.
Third, RSA 508:6, Mortgage Notes, which does something unusual: rather than name a period it borrows one. “Actions upon notes secured by a mortgage of real estate may be brought so long as the plaintiff is entitled to bring an action upon the mortgage.” The note’s life is tied to the mortgage’s, so a secured New Hampshire note is not measured by the three years at all while the security interest remains enforceable.
Fourth, the exception folded inside 508:4, I itself. Where the injury and its causal relationship to the act or omission could not reasonably have been discovered at the time, the three years runs from discovery instead. It is still three years; it is a different starting line. On a debt claim that limb rarely carries the day, but it is the fourth place in the chapter where the plain “three years from the act” answer is not the whole answer, and it is worth knowing it exists before assuming an old account is dead.
What Chapter 508 Does Not Contain
Every section in the chapter, and not one of them revives a claim.
The most valuable thing on this page is a negative, and it is checkable. Chapter 508 is numbered 508:1 through 508:22, but the numbering understates it: lettered sections have been inserted into the run over the years – 508:4-a through 508:4-h, 508:12-a through 508:12-d, 508:17-a and 508:18-a – so the merged text carries thirty-six section headings, not twenty-two. Take the numbered spine first: 508:1 Limitation of Chapter, 508:2 Real Actions, 508:3 Disabilities, 508:4 Personal Actions, 508:5 Specialties, 508:6 Mortgage Notes, 508:7 Writs of Error, 508:8 Disabilities, 508:9 Defendant’s Absence, 508:10 Second Suit, 508:11 Breach of Contract to Marry, 508:12 Aid at Scene of Emergency or to Victim of Crime, 508:13 Professional Malpractice; Evidence, 508:14 Landowner Liability Limited, 508:15 Donors and Distributors of Food, 508:16 Directors and Officers of Charitable Organizations or Societies, 508:17 Volunteers; Nonprofit Organizations, 508:18 Liability Limited; Health Care Facilities and Personnel, 508:19 Liability; Equine Activities, 508:20 Wrongful Death Action on Behalf of Nonsupported Child, 508:21 Liability Limited; Manufacturers, Distributors, Dealers, or Importers of Firearms or Ammunition, and 508:22 Liability Limited for Winter Maintenance. The lettered insertions run the same way – 508:4-b Damages From Construction, 508:12-c Liability Limited for Certain Out-of-State Emergency Services, and so on down the list: limitation periods and liability carve-outs, subject by subject. The whole run is on one page as the merged text of RSA chapter 508; read the headings there against this list.
Not one of the thirty-six – numbered or lettered – is an acknowledgment, new-promise or part-payment section. The chapter that sets New Hampshire’s limitations periods says nothing whatsoever about what restarts one. That is a real structural fact about this state’s code and it has a direct consequence: when a New Hampshire debtor sends fifty dollars on a four-year-old balance, no statute tells you what that did. The question falls to New Hampshire decisional law on acknowledgment and new promise, which is fact-sensitive, and to your attorney.
Compare the state immediately across the Connecticut River. Vermont devotes an entire subchapter of 12 V.S.A. chapter 23 – Subchapter 004, New Promise and Payment – to precisely this, complete with a writing requirement and an evidence rule about who has to have written the ledger entry. Our page on Vermont’s statutory restart rule works through those sections. New Hampshire legislated none of it. Two neighbouring New England states, one river apart, and the answer to “did the payment restart the clock?” comes from completely different places.
This is where secondary summaries go wrong most often: the flat rule you will see stated – that a partial payment restarts the New Hampshire period – is not in the code. No New Hampshire statute says so. If you are triaging paper on the strength of a payment date – the situation our guide to old and zombie debt collection is about – get the effect of that payment confirmed under New Hampshire law before you spend anything on the file, and treat the same caution as travelling with you to other states: Iowa debt collection limitations resolve the identical question by a different route again.
Absence Stops the Count
RSA 508:9, and why it is a records question.
RSA 508:9, Defendant’s Absence: “If the defendant in a personal action was absent from and residing out of the state at the time the cause of action accrued, or afterward, the time of such absence shall be excluded in computing the time limited for bringing the action.” Read that against a three-year period and the arithmetic changes shape. A claim that looks four years stale on the servicing record may be well inside the window if the debtor spent fourteen months of it living in Massachusetts, because those fourteen months come out of the count. The text of RSA 508:9 is four lines long, sits five sections past the one everybody quotes, and is routinely skipped in summaries of the New Hampshire period. The section also has a habit of exporting the file, because the months excluded from the New Hampshire count were months lived under some other state’s records and some other state’s period, and where the absence was spent in a state that measures these claims differently counsel will want both clocks side by side – our Utah limitations page is the companion written to the same shape as this one.
Notice what kind of question the section asks. Not a legal one, in the first instance – a factual one, and a specific one: was this person absent from and residing out of New Hampshire, and between which dates? Whether that history satisfies the section is your attorney’s call. Assembling the history is documentary work: address chronologies from public records, property and registration filings, business registrations, court indices, and the licensed data sources we are permitted to use. It is the same evidence base as locating a judgment debtor, gathered for a different purpose and delivered with dates attached, because a residency timeline is only useful to counsel if every entry in it can be sourced.
Boundaries, stated plainly, because this is the part of the page where they bite. We take work only after a requester gives a lawful reason the law recognises and we can see the connection between that reason and the search – a New Hampshire creditor with an account, a collection firm with a file, an attorney with a matter. Nobody here poses as a bank, a landlord or a relative, and nobody misrepresents who is asking to a town clerk, a registry of deeds or a circuit court clerk. We are not a consumer reporting agency and nothing we deliver is a consumer report; if what you actually need is tenant screening, employment screening or a creditworthiness decision, that is a permissible-purpose product we do not supply and you should go to a CRA for it. We decline locate requests where the record suggests the person has moved because of domestic violence, is protected by a restraining or protective order, or is enrolled in an address confidentiality program – a debt file is not a reason to undo a safety arrangement, and we would rather lose the assignment. And none of this is legal advice: whether RSA 508:9 saves your claim is a question for New Hampshire counsel.
Six Questions, and Whose They Are
Every row names the section or the source it comes from.
| The question | Where the answer comes from | What it settles |
|---|---|---|
| How long is the period? | RSA 508:4, I – three years, on the face of the section | Whether suit is still available at all |
| Is a different statute in play? | RSA 508:1 sends you to it; counsel identifies it | Whether the three years applies |
| Is it a judgment or under seal? | RSA 508:5 – twenty years to bring an action of debt on it | A second filing deadline; enforcement clocks sit elsewhere |
| Did a payment restart it? | Not in chapter 508 at all – New Hampshire counsel on the case law | Whether an old file is worth reopening |
| Was the debtor out of state, and when? | Us. Our part RSA 508:9 makes it a dated records question | How much of the three years actually ran |
| Is there anything to collect? | Us – recorded property, registrations, business interests | Whether the claim is worth filing |
The two rows in our column are the two that no statute can answer for you, and the second is the one that decides economics. A three-year window is short enough that a New Hampshire creditor rarely gets a second run at the same account, so the decision to file wants an asset picture behind it: what the registry of deeds shows, what is registered, what business filings exist. An asset search for judgment collection produces that picture from records, with a source note against each finding and an honest statement of what could not be established. What it never includes is the contents of a private financial account.
How a New Hampshire File Gets Worked
Purpose first, then dates, then assets, then the file.
Establish the Lawful Reason
What the account is and what lawful reason sits behind the search.
Build the Residency Timeline
Dated addresses in and out of New Hampshire, for the 508:9 question.
Identify the Right Person
Distinguishing same-name individuals before anything is filed.
Hand Counsel a Sourced File
Every entry cited, every gap named as a gap.
Six Situations Where the Three Years Bites
What New Hampshire creditors actually bring us.
A File That Looks Expired
Stale on paper, but the debtor spent two of those years living out of state.
A Portfolio Priced on Six Years
Paper bought on an assumption RSA 508:4 does not support.
A Payment Nobody Can Explain
Fifty dollars arrived in year four and no section of chapter 508 says what it did.
Two People, One Name
Suit against the wrong John Sullivan costs more than the balance.
A Judgment Going Cold
Twenty years to sue on it under RSA 508:5, and no idea where the debtor went in year three.
A Deadline Six Weeks Out
Counsel is ready to file and nobody can say where to serve.
Who Brings Us New Hampshire Files
Six roles, one recurring problem.
Creditors of Record
Inside the 508:4, I three years
NH Collection Counsel
Building the 508:9 record
Buyers of NH Paper
Pricing to three years, not six
Community Lenders
Notes riding the mortgage under 508:6
NH Trade Suppliers
Open invoices, no written-account limb
Holders of NH Judgments
508:5’s twenty years to sue on one
The recurring problem is the same across all six: New Hampshire gives a creditor three years and no statutory second chance, so the cost of not knowing where somebody has been is measured in whole claims. What we contribute is a dated, sourced answer to that factual half – the address history, the identity confirmation, the recorded assets – developed through public records and licensed data under a stated permissible purpose. It sits alongside the rest of our skip tracing services. Send the account and the reason you are entitled to ask; a first read typically comes back within 24 hours.
What We Will and Will Not Say
We will give you a dated address history you can put in front of a New Hampshire court, with every entry sourced and every gap named as a gap. We will not tell you whether RSA 508:9 excludes those dates, whether your claim is timely, or what a payment in year four did to the clock – those are for New Hampshire counsel, and a research firm that offers an opinion on them is selling you something it cannot stand behind. Records work since 2004, always under a stated purpose, never by pretext.
New Hampshire Limitations Questions
How long is the statute of limitations on debt in New Hampshire?
Three years. RSA 508:4, I provides that all personal actions, other than slander or libel, may be brought only within 3 years of the act or omission complained of, subject to a discovery rule where the injury could not reasonably have been discovered at the time. A suit to collect an unpaid balance is a personal action, so it sits inside that period. General information, not legal advice – confirm the application to your account with New Hampshire counsel.
Does New Hampshire give written contracts a longer period than open accounts?
RSA 508:4 does not draw that distinction. The section speaks to all personal actions as one category, and no limb of it separates a debt founded on a written instrument from a debt on an open or unwritten account. Longer periods exist, but they come from other sections that name their own subject matter – RSA 508:5 for judgments, recognizances and contracts under seal, and RSA 508:1, which stands the chapter down wherever another statute fixes a different time.
Does a partial payment restart the clock in New Hampshire?
No New Hampshire statute says that it does. Chapter 508 carries thirty-six section headings – 508:1 through 508:22 plus the lettered sections inserted into that run since – and not one of them is an acknowledgment, new-promise or part-payment provision. The chapter that sets the periods is silent on what restarts them. So the effect of a payment is a common-law question decided on the facts, and it belongs to a New Hampshire attorney. A flat rule stated here is stating something the code does not.
What does RSA 508:9 do to the three years?
It removes time from the count. Where the defendant in a personal action was absent from and residing out of the state when the cause of action accrued or afterward, RSA 508:9 provides that the time of that absence is excluded in computing the limitation period. Against a three-year window that can be decisive, which is why the debtor’s dated whereabouts are worth establishing before anyone concludes an account is out of time.
How long does RSA 508:5 give on a New Hampshire judgment?
Twenty years from accrual to bring an action of debt upon the judgment, with the same period for recognizances and sealed contracts. Read it as what it is: a filing deadline for a fresh suit, not a statement that a New Hampshire judgment stays enforceable for twenty years. Enforcement clocks live in other chapters – RSA 511:55, I, for instance, holds attached real or personal property only until six years from the judgment on which execution can be taken. The mechanics of enforcing one – what may be reached and how – are set out on our New Hampshire judgment collection page rather than here.
Can you tell me whether my New Hampshire claim is still timely?
No, and we would not try. Whether the three years has run, whether RSA 508:9 excludes any of it, and whether another statute displaces chapter 508 under RSA 508:1 are legal determinations for a New Hampshire attorney. What we produce is the factual layer underneath those determinations: a dated address chronology, identity confirmation, and a picture of recorded assets, each item cited to where it came from.
What do you need before you will run a search?
A lawful reason the law recognises, and enough about the account for us to see that the reason and the search line up – the obligation, the debtor as you know them, and who is asking. Nobody here adopts a false identity, and the reason for a call to a registry of deeds or a circuit court office is stated accurately. We are not a consumer reporting agency and a locate file is not a consumer report, so if the underlying decision is about a tenancy, a hire, or someone’s creditworthiness, that is regulated work we do not take on.
Are there searches you turn down?
Yes. Where the record indicates a person relocated because of domestic violence, is protected by a restraining or protective order, or participates in an address confidentiality program, we decline the locate regardless of how sound the underlying debt is. A collection file is not a reason to unwind a safety arrangement. We would rather return the assignment than be the reason an address surfaced.
Three Years Is Not Long
Before a New Hampshire account gets written off as stale, find out where the debtor actually lived and when – RSA 508:9 may have been holding the clock the whole time. Tell us the account and the lawful reason behind the request; a first read typically comes back within 24 hours. Contact us to start.
Start Your Request →
