Turnover Orders in Judgment Collection
A turnover order is not aimed at property. It is aimed at a person: the court orders the debtor, or whoever is holding the debtor’s non-exempt property, to deliver it. That is why it reaches things a sheriff’s levy cannot — certificates, cash in a drawer, an asset a relative is holding, property already moved out of state — and why the analysis begins with who the court can order around rather than with where the asset sits. This page reads the remedy from the statute, separates the two different motions inside it, and says plainly when a different tool is the right one.
The Short Version
A turnover order directs a person — usually the judgment debtor — to hand over identified non-exempt property, rather than directing an officer to seize it. New York’s version, CPLR 5225, splits into two: subdivision (a) is a motion where the debtor is in possession or custody of money or other personal property in which the debtor has an interest, and on that showing the court shall order it paid or delivered to a designated sheriff; subdivision (b) is a separate special proceeding against a third party holding the property or a transferee who took it. Because the order runs against a person, personal jurisdiction over that person is what matters, not the location of the asset — which is how Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd. reached share certificates held outside the state. In federal court, Rule 69(a)(1) sends you to the enforcing state’s own turnover practice. Exempt property is outside the remedy, an income stream belongs to an assignment order, and an LLC interest usually belongs to a charging order.
Watch: Ordering the Debtor to Hand It Over
The remedy that runs against a person.
Watch Overview
An Order to the Person, Not to the Property
Why turnover behaves unlike every other enforcement tool.
Nearly every collection remedy is aimed at a thing. A writ of execution tells an officer to seize particular property. A levy freezes a particular account. A lien attaches to a particular parcel. Each of them works by reaching out and taking hold of an asset, which means each of them stops at the border of the court’s reach over that asset.
A turnover order is built the other way round. It is a command addressed to a person — ordinarily the judgment debtor — to deliver identified non-exempt property. Nothing is seized when the order issues. The order works because the court has authority over the person, and the person is expected to obey. That single structural difference is the source of everything else that is unusual about the remedy: what it can reach, where the property may sit, and what happens when the debtor simply refuses.
New York’s statute is a clean example to read, because it puts the two situations side by side in one section. Under CPLR 5225 the court acts on a motion where the debtor is in possession or custody of money or other personal property in which the debtor has an interest, and on that showing the statute says the court shall order the debtor to pay the money over, or to deliver other personal property to a designated sheriff. That is a direction to the debtor, not an instruction to a sheriff to go and take something.
One Statute, Two Different Motions
Who holds the property decides what you file.
| If the DEBTOR holds it — CPLR 5225(a) | If SOMEONE ELSE holds it — CPLR 5225(b) |
|---|---|
| Brought by motion in the existing case | Brought as a separate special proceeding |
| Notice served on the debtor like a summons, or by registered or certified mail | Commenced against the possessor, custodian, or transferee |
| Showing: the debtor is in possession or custody of money or other personal property in which the debtor has an interest | Showing: the debtor is entitled to possession, or the creditor’s rights are superior to the transferee’s |
| Money is paid to the creditor; other personal property is delivered to a designated sheriff | Reaches property already moved to a third party, including a transferee |
| The debtor is the one ordered to act | A stranger to the judgment is the one ordered to act |
The distinction is not cosmetic. Filing the wrong one against the wrong party is the most ordinary way a turnover effort loses months. And the transferee branch is the reason turnover and a traced asset transfer so often travel together: the same facts that show a transfer was improper are the facts that show the creditor’s rights are superior to the transferee’s.
Why It Can Reach Across a State Line
Jurisdiction over the person, not the situs of the asset.
Because the order runs against a person, the question a court asks is whether it has personal jurisdiction over that person — not where the asset happens to sit. New York’s highest court settled the point in Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 12 N.Y.3d 533 (2009), holding that a court sitting in New York may order a bank over which it has personal jurisdiction to deliver stock certificates, and reaching extraterritorial property where the court has personal jurisdiction over the party in possession. The certificates were not in New York. The holder was.
That is a materially different proposition from a levy, which depends on an officer physically reaching the property, and it is why turnover is so often the answer when a debtor has quietly relocated value. It is also why the analysis starts with a jurisdictional question rather than an asset question: who can this court order around?
In federal court the mechanics come from Rule 69(a), which directs that the procedure on execution, and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution, must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, unless a federal statute applies. A federal judgment creditor therefore borrows the enforcing state’s turnover practice rather than a federal one. If your judgment sits in one state and the debtor’s property in another, read our guide to domesticating a judgment in another state before assuming the order will travel.
What It Reaches That a Levy Does Not
Four categories where ordinary execution is the wrong instrument.
Property in the debtor’s own hands
Cash, bullion, jewellery, collectibles, a watch, a laptop full of keys. An officer cannot search a home on a money judgment; an order to the debtor does not need to.
Instruments and certificated securities
Share certificates, notes, and negotiable paper, which have value only as documents and can be posted anywhere in an afternoon.
Property a third party is holding
A relative, an agent, an escrow, a transferee who took the asset after the debt arose. This is the special-proceeding branch of the statute.
Records that prove the rest
Several turnover statutes let the court order the documents and records relating to the property over as well, which is often worth more than the item itself.
None of this reaches exempt property. Exemptions are creatures of state law and they differ sharply, so confirm the specific exemption before the motion is drafted — our guide to what a judgment can and cannot reach is the starting point.
From a Named Asset to Delivery
The order of operations that keeps the motion clean.
Establish who can be ordered
Identify the person in possession and confirm the court’s authority over them — the debtor, a custodian, or a transferee.
Name the property
Develop and document the specific non-exempt item, with enough particularity for a court to describe it in an order.
Confirm it under oath
Post-judgment discovery under Rule 69(a)(2) or state practice pins the holding down before you ask for relief.
File the right instrument
A motion where the debtor holds it; a special proceeding where somebody else does.
Direct delivery to the right hands
Money to the creditor, other property to a designated sheriff — or, where a receiver is already in place, to the receiver.
When Turnover Is the Wrong Tool
Six situations where a different remedy is the right one.
The money is a future stream
Rent, royalties, commissions and receivables are redirected by an assignment order, not delivered as a thing.
The asset is an LLC interest
A membership interest is normally reached by a charging order, which in many states is the exclusive route.
Nobody can say what the asset is
A court needs something to describe. An unspecified suspicion is a discovery problem, not a turnover motion.
The property is claimed exempt
Exempt property is outside the remedy entirely; that fight belongs in the exemption analysis.
The debtor has already refused
Once an order is defied the question becomes enforcement of the order rather than the wording of it.
The estate needs running, not handing over
A going business, or property that must be managed and sold, calls for custody rather than a delivery command.
Each of those has its own page here: assignment orders for income streams, charging orders against an LLC interest, the debtor’s examination when the asset has no name yet, contempt against a debtor who defies an order, and attachment and receivership where custody has to change hands. Where a receiver is already appointed, CPLR 5228(a) directs that an order for payment or delivery go to the receiver rather than to a sheriff, so the two remedies interlock rather than compete. A deficiency judgment after a foreclosure sale behaves the same way once entered — see our deficiency judgment guide — and creditors enforcing in Florida will find the state’s sequence in the Florida judgment collection guide.
Our Part: Naming the Thing
Where the research ends and your counsel begins.
A turnover motion is only as good as the description of the property in it, and that description is a factual problem rather than a legal one. Working from lawful public records and licensed data, and only where a permissible purpose such as enforcing your judgment has been established, we develop and document what the debtor holds, who else is holding it, and where it went — then hand it over with sources attached so it can be described in an order and defended if the description is challenged. We also locate the debtor, because an order addressed to a person who cannot be served is not an order.
The boundaries are firm and they are worth stating in plain terms. Nobody on this team holds a private investigator’s or private detective’s licence, and nothing on this page should be read as claiming otherwise; this is public-records and licensed-data research. We do not pretext, we do not pose as the debtor, a bank, or an employer to get information, and we do not obtain the contents of anyone’s financial accounts. If a request looks like it is really about reaching someone who has fled an abuser or is hiding for their safety, we decline it and do not take the file, whatever the paperwork says. And whether a turnover order, an assignment order, or a receivership is the right motion in your state is a decision for your lawyer — this page is general information about a court procedure, not legal advice.
What We Commit To
A turnover order fails or succeeds on the description of the property in it. We identify and document the specific non-exempt asset, the person holding it, and the trail if it has moved, with sources attached so your counsel can describe it in an order and stand behind the description. We locate the debtor so the order can be served on someone. What we do not do is draft the motion, choose the remedy, or appear in your case. Lawful public-records and licensed-data research for judgment creditors and their counsel since 2004.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a turnover order, in one sentence?
A post-judgment court order directing a person — the judgment debtor, or someone else holding the debtor’s property — to deliver identified non-exempt property, rather than directing an officer to seize it.
Why does it matter that the order runs against a person?
Because the court’s authority over the person, not the location of the asset, is what the order rests on. That is what lets a turnover order reach property sitting outside the forum state, and it is the structural difference from a writ of execution.
Can it really reach property in another state?
It can where the court has personal jurisdiction over whoever holds the property. In Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 12 N.Y.3d 533 (2009), New York’s Court of Appeals held that a court there could order a bank over which it had personal jurisdiction to deliver stock certificates held outside the state.
What is the difference between the two motions?
Under CPLR 5225(a) the creditor moves in the existing case where the debtor is in possession or custody of the property. Under 5225(b) the creditor commences a separate special proceeding against a third party holding it or against a transferee, on a showing that the debtor is entitled to possession or that the creditor’s rights are superior.
Does the same procedure apply in federal court?
Rule 69(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directs that execution procedure, and proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution, accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located unless a federal statute applies. So a federal creditor uses the enforcing state’s turnover practice.
Is a charging order against an LLC the same thing?
No, and treating them as interchangeable is a common and expensive mistake. A member’s interest in a limited liability company is normally reached by a charging order, which in many states is the exclusive remedy against that interest.
How specific does the property have to be?
Specific enough for a court to describe it in an order and for the person ordered to know what to deliver. That is why a debtor’s examination and a documented asset search normally come before the motion rather than after it.
What part of this do you actually do?
The factual half. We identify and document the specific non-exempt property, who is holding it, and where it went if it moved, and we locate the debtor for service. Choosing and drafting the motion is your counsel’s work, and the turnaround on an initial asset picture is typically within 24 hours.
Name the Property, Then Order It Delivered
Send us the debtor’s identifiers and we will document the specific non-exempt property, the person holding it, and the trail if it has been moved — lawfully, sourced, and typically within 24 hours, so the description in your motion can survive a challenge. Contact us to begin.
Start an Asset Search →
