Puerto Rico Judgment Collection
The fifty-state charts either leave Puerto Rico out or print “15 years” beside it. That figure comes from article 1864 of the 1930 Civil Code, and the 1930 Civil Code was replaced. Under the Code in force since 2020, 31 L.P.R.A. section 9495 gives personal actions of every kind four years, and section 9483(b) starts that clock when the judgment becomes firme – final and no longer appealable. A creditor working to fifteen years is working to a period nearly four times the real one. What Puerto Rico gives back is a device the mainland has no equivalent for: under section 9489(b) a simple extrajudicial demand addressed to the debtor interrupts prescription, and interruption does not pause the clock, it returns it to zero. No court, no filing, no fee – a letter. Which means the debtor’s current address is not a convenience on a Puerto Rico file. It is the renewal mechanism. That address, and what the Registro de la Propiedad holds in the name, is the whole of what this firm supplies; nobody here is admitted in Puerto Rico or licensed to investigate anywhere.
Every Noun in a Mainland Collection Page Is Wrong Here
This is not an accent on American law. It is a different legal tradition, and the vocabulary is the tell.
Puerto Rico’s private law descends from the Spanish Civil Code. Its public law is American, its courts are U.S. courts, and its judgments are entitled to the ordinary respect of sister jurisdictions – but the instruments a creditor actually handles are civil-law instruments and they do not map cleanly onto the common-law ones.
There is no judgment lien arising automatically from entry. There is no docketing that creates one. There is no renewal affidavit, no writ of scire facias, no dormancy period, and no revival statute of the kind Ohio, Georgia or Arkansas run. There is no county – Puerto Rico is divided into 78 municipios, and land records are kept not by a county recorder but by the sections of the Registro de la Propiedad. The trial court is the Tribunal de Primera Instancia, sitting in judicial regions rather than counties.
What there is instead: a sentencia that at some point becomes firme; a mandamiento de ejecucion issued under the Secretario’s signature and the court’s seal and directed to an alguacil; a prescripcion that runs against the obligation and can be interrumpida; and, where a court so orders, an anotacion preventiva entered against a property in the Registro. A page that renders those as “judgment lien”, “sheriff”, “statute of limitations” and “recording” has translated the words and lost the mechanics.
Two consequences follow immediately and they are why the vocabulary section comes first rather than last. First, the deadlines are computed from different events than a mainland practitioner expects. Second, the acts that preserve a claim are different acts – and one of them is not an act of a court at all.
Four Years, From Firmeza – Not Fifteen, and Not From Entry
31 L.P.R.A. sections 9495 and 9483(b), and the repealed article every chart is still quoting.
Section 9495 of the 2020 Civil Code is one sentence: personal actions of every kind prescribe in four years, save where the law fixes a different term. There is no separate, longer period for actions founded on a judgment. A money judgment declares an obligation, and an action to enforce that obligation is a personal action.
Section 9483 then tells you when the period starts, item by item, and subsection (b) is the one that matters here: in actions to require performance of an obligation declared by a judgment, time runs from when the judgment becomes firme.
Firme is not entry, and it is not the date the judge signed. It is the point at which the judgment is no longer subject to ordinary review – the appeal window closed without an appeal, or the appellate process concluded. On an uncontested case that may be a matter of weeks after entry. On a case that went up on appeal it can be years later, and the four years has not begun in the meantime. This cuts both ways: it is a shorter period than the mainland expects, starting later than the mainland expects.
Where the fifteen-year figure came from
It came from article 1864 of the 1930 Civil Code, codified at 31 L.P.R.A. section 5294, which gave personal actions with no special term fifteen years. That code was replaced. The figure survives in circulation because the fifty-state charts were compiled before the replacement and have been copied since, and because the English-language mirrors of the Puerto Rico code still serve the 1930 text under the ordinary path – the tree labelled “Title Thirty-One, Civil Code” runs to section 5305 and stops, which is the old code, while the code in force is numbered in the 9000s and is published in Spanish. A researcher who reads the English path in good faith reads a repealed statute and never sees a warning.
One caveat is worth stating rather than papering over. A judgment that became firme while the 1930 Code was still in force, with its fifteen-year period already running when the 2020 Code took effect, raises a transitional question about which period governs and from when. That question is not answered on this page, because answering it correctly requires reading the transitional provisions of the enacting Act against the particular dates on a particular file – which is work for a lawyer admitted in Puerto Rico, not for a records firm. What can be said without qualification is that for judgments becoming firme under the current Code, the period is four years.
The other periods, for orientation
Section 9496 sets out five further terms, lettered (a) to (e) in the enacted text: one year for extracontractual liability, counted from when the injured person knows of the harm and who caused it; one year for actions to recover or retain possession; two years for professional disciplinary actions; twenty years for the accion hipotecaria, the mortgage action; and thirty years for real actions over immovables. Section 9494 provides that actions relating to real rights subsist as long as the right of the person invoking them subsists, unless the law says otherwise, and section 9497 lists what does not prescribe at all – claiming an inheritance or its partition, dividing common property, and fixing the boundaries of adjoining properties.
The gap between four years for the judgment and twenty or thirty for the real-rights actions is worth noticing. A creditor holding a judgment and a creditor holding a recorded real right are on very different timetables here, and the first is far shorter than the second.
The Short Version
Puerto Rico is a civil-law jurisdiction. Under the 2020 Civil Code, 31 L.P.R.A. section 9495 prescribes personal actions of every kind in four years, and section 9483(b) starts that period when the judgment becomes firme. The “15 years” in the fifty-state charts is article 1864 of the repealed 1930 Code. Section 9489(b) allows prescription to be interrupted by an extrajudicial demand addressed to the debtor – and on interruption the full period restarts rather than pausing, so the debtor’s deliverable address is the practical renewal device. Procedurally, Regla 51.1 permits execution as of right for five years from firmeza and by leave of court on motion with notice thereafter, excluding any period execution was suspended. The writ is a mandamiento de ejecucion served by the alguacil, returnable to the Secretario within 15 days, and it does not need reissuing when it comes back unsatisfied.
Watch: The Letter That Resets the Clock
Why an extrajudicial demand does more for a Puerto Rico judgment than a filing.
Watch Overview
A Letter to the Debtor Restarts the Whole Term
31 L.P.R.A. section 9489 – and the reason an address matters more here than anywhere on the mainland.
Section 9489 lists three interrupting acts, and the middle one has no common-law counterpart. Prescription of an action is interrupted: (a) by the creditor filing a judicial claim, or an administrative or arbitral claim, against the debtor in protection of the right belonging to him – and, in disciplinary matters, by the filing of the complaint; (b) by an extrajudicial claim made by the creditor and addressed to the debtor; or (c) by the debtor’s acknowledgment of the obligation.
Then the sentence that changes the strategy: “Producida la interrupcion, comienza nuevamente a transcurrir el computo del plazo prescriptivo.” Once interruption has occurred, the computation of the prescriptive period begins to run again. Not suspended. Not tolled for the duration of something. Reset, to zero, with a fresh four years.
Set that against how a mainland creditor preserves a judgment. In Ohio it takes an execution or one of three other docket acts inside five years. In South Dakota it takes an eleven-item sworn affidavit filed with a clerk. In Arkansas it takes a writ of scire facias sued out and served or advertised at a courthouse door. Every one of those is a court act with a fee, a form and a filing deadline.
In Puerto Rico, subsection (b) lets a creditor restart the four years by writing to the debtor. There is no court involved, no filing, and no fee. What there is, unavoidably, is a requirement that the demand be addressed to the debtor – which is to say, that the creditor know where the debtor is, before the four years run out, and be able to demonstrate later that the demand was directed there.
That is why a Puerto Rico file is an address problem before it is anything else. On the mainland, losing track of a debtor costs you the ability to enforce while the judgment sits safely on a docket. Here, losing track of the debtor costs you the cheapest and most repeatable means of keeping the obligation alive at all, and the loss is silent – nothing on any docket records that the four years have quietly resumed running from a date nobody diarised.
Section 9482 supplies a related point that cuts in the creditor’s favour. Prescriptive periods begin to run when the person entitled knows, or ought to know, of the right to claim and of the identity of the person against whom to act – and ignorance of the responsible person’s name does not prevent exercising the action. Not knowing who to sue is not, by itself, a reason the clock has not started.
Regla 51.1 Says Five Years. The Code Says Four.
Puerto Rico disagrees with itself across the boundary between its Rules of Civil Procedure and its Civil Code.
Regla 51.1 of the Reglas de Procedimiento Civil de 2009 provides that the party in whose favour judgment is entered may execute it by the Rule 51 procedure at any time within five years of the judgment becoming firme. Once that term has expired, the judgment may be executed only by authorisation of the court, on motion of a party, with prior notice to all parties. And where execution has been suspended by an order or judgment of the court or by operation of law, the period of suspension is excluded from the computation of the five years.
So the procedural window is five years, and the substantive prescription of the obligation is four – both measured from the same event. They are not the same rule doing the same work: Regla 51.1 governs the manner of enforcement, and section 9495 governs whether the obligation survives to be enforced. But a creditor who reads only the rule will believe there are five clear years and may take no interrupting step in the fourth. The prudent reading, and the one this page gives, is that the shorter Code period is the one to manage against, with the rule’s fifth year treated as procedural latitude rather than as extra life.
Even inside Regla 51.1 the events do not perfectly align: the main clause runs from the judgment being firme, while the suspension clause is drafted from the point at which the judgment was registrada – registered. On most files those coincide. On some they do not.
The writ, and why it does not need reissuing
Under Regla 51.2, a money judgment is enforced by a mandamiento de ejecucion which states the terms of the judgment and the amount outstanding. It is directed to the alguacil for delivery to the interested party and issues under the signature of the Secretario and the seal of the court. A single writ may be issued on one or more judgments and orders in the same suit. In every execution, judicial sales included, the alguacil must return the executed writ and any surplus in hand to the Secretario within fifteen days of the execution.
Then the provision that reverses a mainland expectation: where service of the writ does not fully satisfy the judgment, or proves fruitless, no additional writ need be issued. The alguacil records each attempt immediately on the back of the true and exact copy of the writ, and records the attempt that finally satisfies the judgment on the original. A common-law creditor who is used to obtaining an alias writ after each unsatisfied return is doing paperwork Puerto Rico does not require.
Discovery in aid is a deposition
Regla 51.4 gives the judgment creditor or an assignee the right, in aid of the judgment or its execution, to interrogate any person, including the judgment debtor, under the rules governing depositions. Where the deposition proceeds on written questions, the citation may dispense with personal appearance provided the deponent delivers sworn answers to the creditor or counsel before the date set. The court may issue any order it considers just and necessary to execute the judgment and to safeguard the rights of creditor, debtor and third parties.
The device is therefore a deposition rather than a citation to discover assets or a judgment-debtor examination, and it reaches any person, not only the debtor. Practically, it means the people who need to be located on a Puerto Rico file are not just the debtor but whoever holds the facts – and each of them has to be served with a citation somewhere.
The Debtor Picks What Is Seized, and the Sale Runs on the Last Known Address
Reglas 51.5, 51.7 and 51.8 – including a heading that means the opposite of what a creditor will assume.
Regla 51.5 directs the alguacil, or the person the court designates, to satisfy the judgment with interest and costs out of the debtor’s property. But where the debtor holds property worth more than the judgment and costs, the alguacil must levy only on the portion the debtor indicates, provided what the debtor points to is amply sufficient to cover the judgment, accrued interest and costs. That is a debtor-selection right, and it means a creditor cannot simply direct the officer to the most saleable asset. It also means the creditor who arrives knowing what the debtor owns is negotiating from a much better position than the one who does not, because the sufficiency of the debtor’s choice is a factual question.
The same rule contains a small, specific protection: a writ on a judgment obtained under the summary procedure of Regla 60 may not be executed on a Saturday, Sunday, holiday or outside working hours, unless an imperious necessity is shown.
The notice regime, and the sanction for missing it
Regla 51.7(a) requires the sale to be publicised for two weeks by written notices visibly posted in three public places in the municipio where the sale will be held – the rule names the alcaldia, the tribunal and the colecturia as examples. The notice must additionally be published by edicto twice in a newspaper of general circulation in Puerto Rico over two consecutive weeks, with at least seven days between the two publications. A copy must be sent to the judgment debtor and to counsel by certified mail with return receipt within the first five days after the first edicto is published, where the debtor appeared in the suit – and where the debtor did not appear, to the last known address.
The rule then supplies the sanction, and it is not a slap on the wrist: any judicial sale conducted without complying with the notice requirement in the manner indicated is null, without prejudice to the liability of the party who promoted the sale. Where a party contends the promoting party failed any requirement of the rule, the court on request holds a hearing to resolve it.
Regla 51.7(b) fixes the mechanics: the sale may take place after fourteen days from the first publication, by auction to the highest bidder, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Once enough property has been sold to satisfy the order, no further property may be sold. The officer executing the order, any delegate, and any officer or employee of any sala are barred from buying directly or indirectly. Movable property capable of manual delivery must be in view of the bidders and sold in lots likely to fetch the highest prices; immovable property consisting of several known parcels must be sold separately, and where a third person claims a portion and demands separate sale, it must be sold that way. The debtor may determine the order of sale where the property consists of items or parcels that can advantageously be sold separately, and the alguacil must follow those instructions.
Notice what that address requirement does to a file. Where the debtor never appeared – which describes a large share of collection judgments – the validity of the sale depends on certified mail sent to the last known address, and an invalid sale is void rather than voidable. The address is not administrative tidiness. It is a condition of the sale standing up.
A heading that means the opposite of what it looks like
Regla 51.8 is captioned, in part, renovacion de la sentencia – renewal of the judgment. A creditor scanning the rule headings for Puerto Rico’s renewal provision will stop here, and will be wrong.
The rule is about the purchaser at a judicial sale who, having paid, does not obtain title or possession because of an irregularity in the sale rendering it void, or because the thing sold was not subject to execution. On the interested party’s application, after notice to all interested persons and a hearing, the court must do one of two things: order and issue a writ against the judgment creditor or creditors for the sum each received from the execution, plus current legal interest from receipt until returned; or reinstate the judgment that gave rise to the auction in favour of the successful bidder, up to the amount paid at the sale, with interest from the date of payment at the rate stated in the judgment – and from that date the reinstated judgment has the same force and effect as the original. Where the execution was partial, the successful bidder’s right of recovery against the original judgment creditor takes priority.
So the judgment that gets “renewed” runs in favour of the disappointed buyer and against the creditor who took the money. Puerto Rico has no creditor-side judgment renewal procedure at all; what it has is section 9489’s interruption, which is why this page spends its middle on a letter.
A Creditor Remedy the Common Law Does Not Have
The accion oblicua, the derecho de retencion, and a summary of which act moves which deadline.
31 L.P.R.A. section 9631 sits in the part of the Code headed La Proteccion del Credito and it grants something no common-law jurisdiction offers in this form. Creditors, after having pursued the property the debtor possesses in order to realise what is owed them, may exercise all of the debtor’s rights and actions for the same purpose, excepting those inherent in his person.
Two halves, both load-bearing. The prerequisite is exhaustion: the accion oblicua is subsidiary, available after the creditor has gone after what the debtor actually holds, which means a documented, unsuccessful pursuit is the entry ticket. The grant is then very wide: the creditor steps into the debtor’s position as to claims the debtor has and has not troubled to enforce – a receivable the debtor never collected, an inheritance the debtor never claimed, an action against a third party the debtor let lie. Rights inherent in the person are excluded.
Section 9641 gives a quieter remedy, the derecho de retencion: a creditor whose claim is due may keep the movable or immovable thing owed in his possession until the debtor pays or secures the debt. It requires no prior declaration and no judicial authorisation to exercise, though it must be raised in answer to a demand for restitution or delivery.
Both remedies reward the same preparation. The oblique action needs a documented record of what was pursued and what the debtor actually holds; without that, the exhaustion prerequisite is an assertion rather than a showing.
| Act | Authority | Where it happens | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judgment becomes firme | 31 L.P.R.A. 9483(b) | Tribunal de Primera Instancia | Starts the four-year prescription of the obligation |
| Extrajudicial demand to the debtor | 31 L.P.R.A. 9489(b) | No court; a communication to the debtor | Interrupts prescription and restarts the full four years |
| Judicial, administrative or arbitral claim | 31 L.P.R.A. 9489(a) | Court or tribunal | Same restarting effect |
| Debtor’s acknowledgment of the obligation | 31 L.P.R.A. 9489(c) | Anywhere | Same restarting effect |
| Mandamiento de ejecucion as of right | Regla 51.1 | Secretario issues; alguacil executes | Available five years from firmeza, suspensions excluded |
| Execution after the five years | Regla 51.1 | Court, on motion with notice to all parties | Available only by leave of court |
| Return of the writ | Regla 51.2 | Alguacil to Secretario | Within 15 days; no new writ needed if unsatisfied |
| Deposition in aid of the judgment | Regla 51.4 | Under the deposition rules; any person | Discovery of assets; may proceed on written questions |
| Notice of judicial sale | Regla 51.7(a) | Three public places in the municipio, plus two edictos | Non-compliance makes the sale null |
| Accion oblicua | 31 L.P.R.A. 9631 | Court, after pursuing what the debtor holds | Creditor exercises the debtor’s own rights and actions |
The Address Is the Deadline, and the Registro Is the Map
What a Puerto Rico file needs established, and where our part of it stops.
Three provisions on this page put a person’s whereabouts at the centre of a legal outcome, which is unusual density even for this subject. Section 9489(b) makes a demand addressed to the debtor the cheapest way to restart four years. Regla 51.7(a) makes certified mail to the last known address a condition of a valid sale where the debtor never appeared. Regla 51.4 lets the creditor depose any person, each of whom must be found and cited. None of those is a question of law. Each is a question about where somebody is and what stands in their name, answered from records, before a date.
On a Puerto Rico matter we establish four things and label each one. Who the debtor actually is, separated from the same-name records that accumulate wherever the two-surname convention is in use and where de, del and hyphenated maternal surnames are transcribed inconsistently across systems – this is the step mainland researchers most often get wrong, because a name indexed under the paternal surname alone will miss records filed under both. Where the debtor is now, on the island or on the mainland – the same problem as any attempt to find someone in Puerto Rico, but with a statutory deadline attached – each element sourced and dated. What the Registro de la Propiedad holds in the name, by section and municipio. And, where lawful sources identify them, the employer or the depository – identified from records, never coaxed out of anyone.
We also say plainly what the records will not carry. A section of the Registro returning nothing under the spellings searched is exactly that, and it is not evidence the debtor owns no property in Puerto Rico. Registry practice, the effect of a particular anotacion, and any question about the rank of an entry are matters for a Puerto Rico lawyer and for the Registro itself, and we do not offer a view dressed up as a finding.
Where our part stops
We issue no mandamiento, serve nothing through the alguacil, record nothing in the Registro, take no deposition under Regla 51.4, and send no demand under section 9489(b) – that letter is the creditor’s act and its wording and proof of dispatch matter far too much to be delegated to a records firm. Judgment debtors are never contacted by us. And no fact here is ever obtained by adopting a false identity or a false reason for the enquiry, toward a Registro clerk, an employer, or anyone else, because a fact produced that way is of no use to counsel who may have to prove where it came from. Nobody at this firm holds a Puerto Rico investigator’s licence or a bar admission, and the firm collects no debts.
Nothing is searched until the requester has put a lawful basis on the record – the judgment held or represented, and what the answer will be used for. That permissible-purpose requirement runs the other way as well: this is not a consumer reporting agency, and its work cannot be used to decide a tenancy, a hiring question, or the pricing of credit or insurance, all of which the Fair Credit Reporting Act at 15 U.S.C. 1681b reserves to agencies regulated as such.
One refusal admits of no exception: where an enquiry looks like a route to a person who would be endangered by being located – a former partner, someone protected by an order, someone whose whereabouts a court has restricted – it is declined, and attaching a judgment to the request changes nothing. Everything set out here is a reading of the Reglas de Procedimiento Civil and the 2020 Codigo Civil and is not legal advice; a lawyer admitted in Puerto Rico is who should apply it to your file, and that is especially true of the transitional question about older judgments flagged above.
Because Puerto Rico is a sociedad legal de gananciales jurisdiction, whether an asset answers for one spouse’s debt is a separate question with its own rules, set out on Puerto Rico community property laws. Wage-execution limits are on Puerto Rico wage garnishment laws and exempt property on Puerto Rico asset exemptions from creditors; this page states no exemption figure, because the schedule was not something we read at primary source in preparing it. If the judgment was rendered elsewhere, domesticating foreign judgments covers the step that has to precede all of the above.
Our Commitment
Puerto Rico research comes back labelled in three registers rather than one: what the Registro de la Propiedad sections and the court record actually establish; what they indicate without settling; and what lies outside them altogether – each entry showing its origin and the day it was pulled. Because section 9489(b) makes a demand to the debtor the difference between four more years and none, and because Regla 51.7 voids a sale noticed to the wrong address, an address we cannot stand behind is reported as unconfirmed rather than offered as current.
Puerto Rico Judgment Questions
Starting with the number every chart gets wrong.
How long is a judgment good for in Puerto Rico?
Four years, not the fifteen the fifty-state charts still print. Under the 2020 Civil Code, 31 L.P.R.A. section 9495 prescribes personal actions of every kind in four years unless the law fixes a different term, and section 9483(b) starts that period for an obligation declared by judgment when the judgment becomes firme – final and no longer appealable. The fifteen-year figure comes from article 1864 of the 1930 Civil Code, which has been replaced. A judgment that became firme under the old code raises a transitional question that needs Puerto Rico counsel.
Can I keep a Puerto Rico judgment alive without going back to court?
Yes, and this is the most useful feature of the system for a creditor. Under 31 L.P.R.A. section 9489(b), prescription is interrupted by an extrajudicial claim made by the creditor and addressed to the debtor – and the statute provides that once interruption occurs the computation of the period begins to run again. It restarts rather than pausing. No filing, no fee and no court are involved, but the demand has to be addressed to the debtor, so it depends entirely on having a current address.
Is Puerto Rico a common law or a civil law jurisdiction?
Civil law, in its private law. Puerto Rico’s Civil Code descends from the Spanish tradition, so the instruments are civil-law instruments: a sentencia that becomes firme, a mandamiento de ejecucion executed by an alguacil, prescripcion rather than a statute of limitations, and entries in the Registro de la Propiedad rather than county recordings. There is no judgment lien arising from entry, no docketing, no renewal affidavit, no scire facias and no dormancy statute, and there are 78 municipios rather than counties.
How long do I have to execute on a Puerto Rico judgment?
Regla 51.1 of the Reglas de Procedimiento Civil de 2009 allows execution by the Rule 51 procedure at any time within five years of the judgment becoming firme. After that term the judgment may be executed only by authorisation of the court, on motion of a party and with prior notice to all parties. Any time during which execution was suspended by court order or judgment or by operation of law is excluded from the five years. Note that this five-year procedural window is longer than the four-year prescription of the underlying obligation.
What is a mandamiento de ejecucion and does it need reissuing?
It is the writ of execution. Under Regla 51.2 it specifies the terms of the judgment and the amount outstanding, issues under the signature of the Secretario and the seal of the court, and is directed to the alguacil for delivery to the interested party, who must return it executed together with any surplus within fifteen days. It does not need reissuing: where service does not fully satisfy the judgment or proves fruitless, the rule provides that no additional writ is necessary, and the alguacil records each attempt on the back of the true copy.
Does Regla 51.8 let me renew my Puerto Rico judgment?
No – and the heading is a trap. Regla 51.8 is captioned in part ‘renovacion de la sentencia’, but it operates for the benefit of a purchaser at a judicial sale who paid and then failed to obtain title or possession because of an irregularity voiding the sale, or because the thing sold was not subject to execution. The court must either issue a writ against the judgment creditors for what each received plus legal interest, or reinstate the judgment in favour of the successful bidder up to the amount paid. The reinstated judgment runs against the creditor, not for one.
Can the debtor choose what gets seized?
To a degree, yes. Regla 51.5 provides that where the debtor’s property is worth more than the judgment with costs, the alguacil must levy only on the part the debtor indicates, provided it is amply sufficient to cover the judgment, accrued interest and costs. Regla 51.7(b) separately allows the debtor to determine the order in which property is sold where it consists of items or parcels that can advantageously be sold separately, and the alguacil must follow those instructions. Knowing what the debtor owns is therefore how a creditor tests whether the debtor’s choice is really sufficient.
What does your firm do on a Puerto Rico judgment, and what will it not do?
We establish the facts the rules assume somebody already has: who the debtor is, separated from same-name records under Puerto Rico’s two-surname convention; where the debtor is now, on the island or the mainland; what the Registro de la Propiedad holds in the name, by section and municipio; and, where lawful sources name them, the employer or depository – every item sourced and dated. We issue no mandamiento, serve nothing through the alguacil, record nothing in the Registro, take no deposition under Regla 51.4, and send no section 9489(b) demand, because that letter is the creditor’s own act. Debtors are not contacted and nothing is obtained by adopting a false identity. Nobody here holds a Puerto Rico investigator’s licence or bar admission, the firm collects no debts, and it is not a consumer reporting agency, so its work cannot decide a tenancy, a hiring question, or the price of credit or insurance. Enquiries that look like a route to someone who would be endangered by being located are declined.
The Four Years Restart With a Letter. The Letter Needs Somewhere to Go.
Section 9489(b) is the cheapest thing in Puerto Rico collection practice and the only thing it requires is a deliverable address, held before the period runs out. Tell us who the debtor is and the lawful basis for the enquiry, and you will have their current whereabouts together with what the Registro de la Propiedad carries in that name, by municipio – sourced, dated, and on a routine file returned within 24 hours. Contact us for a frank account of how far the island records reach.
Start Your Request →
