Where Kansas Keeps the Records That Locate a Person
Kansas tells you what you may look at, and then tells you what you may do with it afterwards. Under K.S.A. 45-230, a roster of names and addresses pulled out of this state’s public records may not lawfully be sold on, handed over or accepted where the object is marketing to the people named in it – seven exceptions are written into the section and the penalty is priced per breach – and K.S.A. 45-220 lets any custodian demand a signed certification before handing the records over. On the court side, Supreme Court Rule 22 runs two doors rather than one: an online portal that eleven categories of case and fifteen categories of document never reach, and a courthouse terminal every district court is required to keep. Layer on a migration that moved all thirty-one judicial districts onto a new case management system across eight separate go-live dates, and Kansas becomes a state where the same facts can look different depending on which year and which building you ask in. Everything here comes from the public record or from data held under licence, and the lawful reason for a search is settled in writing beforehand. This is a records-research practice; nothing below is legal advice.
The Short Version
Kansas skip tracing turns on a limit on use and a split in access. K.S.A. 45-230 forbids knowingly selling, giving or receiving a list of names and addresses derived from public records to market to the people on it, and K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2) lets a custodian require a written certification first. Court records run on Supreme Court Rule 22, which keeps eleven case types and fifteen document types off the public portal and bars a clerk from bulk distribution. Land sits with an elected register of deeds in each of the 105 counties. We work only from public records and licensed data. No consumer reporting agency status attaches to this practice. General information, not legal advice.
Kansas Regulates the Use, Not Only the Look
K.S.A. 45-230 and the certification that sits in front of it.
Start with the provision the vendor pages for this state pass over, because it is the one that decides how a records list may lawfully be handled once it exists.
K.S.A. 45-230 is headed “unlawful use of names derived from public records”. Subsection (a) provides that no person shall knowingly sell, give or receive, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to persons listed therein, any list of names and addresses contained in or derived from public records – and then sets out the exceptions.
Seven exceptions, counted from the enacted text
- Division of vehicles lists obtained under K.S.A. 74-2012.
- Lists of people licensed, registered or certified to practise a profession or vocation, sold or given to an organisation of that profession for membership, informational or related purposes.
- Lists of examination applicants, to organisations providing professional or vocational educational materials or courses, and for the sole purpose of telling those people that such materials or courses exist.
- Voter registration lists, compiled, used, sold or purchased by a person as defined in K.S.A. 21-5111, solely for political campaign or election purposes.
- Postsecondary institution lists, given to and disseminated by that institution’s separately incorporated affiliates and supporting organisations qualifying under section 501(c)(3), in furtherance of the institution’s purposes and programmes.
- Secretary of State lists obtained under the Uniform Commercial Code search provision at K.S.A. 84-9-523.
- And a residual seventh: “to the extent otherwise authorized by law.”
Subsection (b) sets the consequence: a person who knowingly violates the section is liable for a civil penalty in an action brought by the attorney general or a county or district attorney, in a sum set by the court up to five hundred dollars for each violation. Per-violation pricing is what makes a list-based breach expensive rather than symbolic.
The certification a Kansas custodian may put in front of you
The enforcement mechanism sits one section earlier. K.S.A. 45-220(c) provides that where access to records, or the purpose for which they may be used, is limited under 45-221 or 45-230, the agency may require the requester to certify in writing either that they have a right of access and the basis for it, or that they will not use any list of names or addresses from the records to sell or offer to sell anything to the people listed, and will not pass such a list to anyone else for that purpose.
Subsection (c) of 45-230 then closes the loop from the custodian’s side: an official, agency or records custodian who released the material in good faith compliance with the Open Records Act, to a requester who executed that certification, carries no liability under the section. The risk transfers to the requester, which is exactly why the certification is worth reading rather than signing on autopilot.
Two Attorney General opinions are printed under the statute and both are useful. Opinion 2006-26 addresses a public agency using names it already holds to contact those people about available services. Opinion 2009-18 constrains the custodian rather than the requester: a certification cannot be demanded unless the records actually contain a list of names and addresses, or such a list can be derived from them.
None of this makes public-records research unlawful in Kansas. It makes one specific downstream use unlawful – marketing to the people on the list – and it puts a signature behind the promise not to do it. That is a narrower rule than “Kansas records are restricted”, and getting the difference right is the whole point.
Watch: Two Doors and a Signature
How a Kansas request is framed before it is sent to a clerk.
Watch Overview
Thirty-One Districts, Eight Go-Live Dates
The Kansas record has a migration seam, and the Judicial Branch publishes exactly where it falls.
Between 2019 and 2024 Kansas replaced the case management software running its district courts. That sounds like an IT story. It is a records story, because the Judicial Branch states plainly that whether a court is operating on Kansas eCourt affects “which court’s case information can be searched on the Kansas District Court Public Access Portal”.
The schedule, as published
- 5 August 2019 – the 8th (Dickinson, Geary, Marion, Morris) and the 21st (Clay, Riley).
- 2 November 2020 – the 4th, 6th, 11th, 14th, 19th and 31st.
- 1 November 2021 – the 13th (Butler, Elk, Greenwood).
- 11 July 2022 – the 2nd, 5th, 12th, 15th, 17th, 20th, 22nd, 23rd and 28th.
- 12 September 2022 – the 1st, 9th, 16th, 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th and 30th.
- 3 April 2023 – the 3rd (Shawnee), the 7th (Douglas) and the 29th (Wyandotte).
- 7 August 2023 – the 18th (Sedgwick).
- 17 June 2024 – the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.
- 5 November 2024 – the 10th (Johnson), last of the district courts.
Counting the district entries gives 2 + 6 + 1 + 9 + 8 + 3 + 1 + 1, which is thirty-one – every judicial district in the state, and the two most populous counties in Kansas among the final three arrivals. Wyandotte crossed in April 2023, Sedgwick that August, Johnson not until November 2024.
Why the seam has legal consequences, in the Supreme Court’s own words
The commentary to Rule 22 does something unusually candid: it describes how the two systems behaved differently on the same facts. On subsection (d)(15) it records that in the previous system, FullCourt, “a criminal case was automatically sealed when an arrest warrant was approved by a judge; when a return on an arrest warrant was filed, the case was unsealed”. Under Odyssey a criminal complaint is not sealed even where a proposed arrest warrant is filed at the same time or an arrest warrant is signed and issued – only the warrant itself is sealed, until a return is filed, at which point warrant and return become public unless a court orders otherwise. Comments on search warrants and bench warrants set out the same pattern.
The practical reading is this. A Kansas criminal matter that began before a district’s go-live date may have been invisible during the period when a warrant was outstanding, and the same matter beginning after that date would not have been. Anyone reading a Kansas case history across the seam without knowing where the seam falls will draw a conclusion about a person from an artefact of software procurement. We date the districts before we read the history, and where a matter straddles a changeover we say so in the report rather than smoothing it over. Where the underlying question is enforcement rather than history, that sits in our note on Kansas judgment collection.
Two Doors, and Two Enumerated Lists
Rule 22 names what the portal will not show, and forbids the clerk to build you a list.
Supreme Court Rule 22 is short, specific and worth reading before anybody quotes a Kansas case search at you. Its own statement of purpose concedes that “not all public case records and events indices will be available using the public access portal due to their sensitive nature”, and that records kept off the portal “may still be accessible through alternative means, such as at a courthouse terminal”. It also draws the harder line: nonpublic case records are available at neither.
Eleven case types that never reach the portal
Rule 22(c) enumerates them, and the list is worth having in full because several of the eleven are exactly the categories an ill-founded locate request tries to lean on: adoptions under K.S.A. 59-2111 et seq.; care and treatment proceedings for mentally ill persons and for persons with an alcohol or substance abuse problem; child in need of care cases; coroner inquests; expunged cases; grand jury proceedings; inquisitions; parental bypass proceedings; protection from abuse cases under K.S.A. 60-3101 et seq.; protection from stalking, sexual assault, or human trafficking cases under K.S.A. 60-31a01 et seq.; and cases under the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, K.S.A. 60-31b01 et seq.
Fifteen document types, including whole family files
Rule 22(d) works at document level rather than case level, and this is where a result gets misread. Any document filed in a child custody, visitation and support proceeding is off the portal. So is any document in a dissolution of marriage case, and any document in a parentage case. The rest of the list runs to Child Death Review Board documents, citations, coroner reports, guardianship and conservatorship documents, juvenile offender documents, marriage licence documents beyond the limited record a clerk creates under Rule 106(d), poverty affidavits, presentence investigation reports, probable cause affidavits, records of agency proceedings under the Kansas Administrative Procedure Act or Judicial Review Act, trial exhibits, and unexecuted arrest, search and bench warrants.
Read together with the case list, that means a Kansas divorce shows as a case and nothing else. Its filings – the ones that would carry an address, a residence, an employer – are not on the portal at all.
The clerk will not build the list for you
Rule 22(b)(2)(B) is one sentence long and it closes a route many workflows quietly assume: “A clerk will not compile information or provide bulk distribution of information under Rule 106B(e).” That is a prohibition rather than a capacity caveat. Subsection (b)(2)(C) then routes document requests through the Kansas Open Records Act, which brings the whole of the first section of this page – the certification, and the limit on what a list of names may afterwards be used for – back into play at the courthouse counter. A creditor holding a Kansas judgment meets that sentence first: no clerk is going to sweep thirty-one districts for whichever county the debtor surfaced in, so locating a judgment debtor here begins by fixing the county and its district and then working each as its own search. Where your file needs more than one of those thirty-one districts worked, you can open a Kansas locate and have each district searched as its own matter.
Rule 22(b)(2)(A) supplies the counterweight: each district court and the appellate courts must maintain a courthouse terminal accessible to the public. The material is not gone. It is in a building, in a county, and a plan that does not name the county is not a plan. Where the wider task is placing a person rather than pulling a filing, the approach sits on our finding someone in Kansas page, and the metropolitan corridor across Wyandotte and Johnson counties is treated in more local detail on our Kansas City skip tracing page.
An Elected Recorder in Each of 105 Counties
Bonded to the county, and the moment of filing is the moment notice attaches.
Kansas keeps its land record where it has kept it since statehood: with a register of deeds, one to a county, elected rather than appointed. K.S.A. 19-1201 provides that beginning with the 1976 general election a register of deeds is elected in each county for a four-year term, and must file with the county clerk a corporate surety bond of not less than ten thousand dollars, conditioned on faithful performance of the office and on delivering all property of the office to a successor.
The bond and the delivery condition are not decoration. They are why a Kansas county’s record survives a change of officeholder as a continuous series rather than as one administration’s files followed by another’s, and it is part of why the older paper indices in this state tend to be intact where the online image set does not reach.
What filing does, and when
K.S.A. 58-2222 supplies the operative rule: an instrument in writing, certified and recorded as prescribed, “from the time of filing the same with the register of deeds for record, impart[s] notice to all persons of the contents thereof; and all subsequent purchasers and mortgagees shall be deemed to purchase with notice.”
Two things follow that are useful to anyone reading a Kansas chain. The clock starts at filing, not at indexing and not at imaging, so a recently filed instrument is legally effective against the world while still being invisible on a county’s website. And the notice runs to “all persons”, not merely to parties, which is why a Kansas recording is treated here as evidence of a person’s dealings at a date rather than as a database entry of uncertain provenance. For anyone weighing what a Kansas judgment might actually reach, the gap between filing and imaging is the practical risk, which is why an asset search run for judgment collection is worked against each register’s own index and dated to the day an instrument was filed rather than the day a county website caught up with it.
One hundred and five counties, and no shortcut across them
There are 105 counties in Kansas – counted from the Census Bureau’s 2020 county reference file rather than repeated from a directory – and each register of deeds is its own office with its own website, its own image start date and its own indexing conventions. The population is concentrated: Johnson, Sedgwick, Shawnee, Wyandotte and Douglas counties account for a large share of it, and those are also the districts that migrated to eCourt last. Across western Kansas a judicial district commonly covers five, six or seven counties, so a district-level fact and a county-level fact are frequently not the same fact. We resolve county before we resolve anything else, and we list the counties we did not run. Where the practical question is what a creditor may reach from a Kansas wage packet, that belongs with our note on Kansas wage garnishment rules.
Which Kansas Office Holds It, and What Rule Governs It
Route the request against the rule, because in this state the rule moves more often than the office.
The middle column names the custodian. The right column names the provision that decides whether a request reaches what the custodian holds.
| What you want | Who holds it | The governing provision |
|---|---|---|
| Deeds, mortgages, liens | The elected register of deeds for that county 105 Counties | K.S.A. 19-1201 for the office; K.S.A. 58-2222 for notice from the time of filing. |
| Whether a case exists | Kansas District Court Public Access Portal | Rule 22(b)(1), subject to the exclusions in 22(c) and 22(d). |
| Protection order proceedings | The district court file | Rule 22(c)(9), (10) and (11) keep these case types off the portal entirely. |
| Divorce, parentage or custody filings | The district court file | Rule 22(d)(1), (5) and (9): every document in those cases is off the portal. |
| A list built from several cases | Nobody, at the courthouse | Rule 22(b)(2)(B): a clerk will not compile or bulk distribute information. |
| Records containing names and addresses | Any Kansas public agency | K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2) certification; K.S.A. 45-230 limits the later use. |
| A mailing address for a protected person | The Attorney General, as designated address | K.S.A. 75-453 and 75-455; entry is through an enrolling agent only. |
Six Ways a Kansas Search Produces a False Impression
Each of them is a published rule or a published date, not bad luck.
A Family File Read as Empty
Rule 22(d) puts every document in a divorce, parentage or custody case off the portal. The case still exists.
History Read Across the Seam
A district’s eCourt go-live date changes what was ever public. Compare like with like or say that you cannot.
A Certification Signed Unread
K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2) is a promise about later use, and K.S.A. 45-230 prices a breach for every violation.
A District Mistaken for a County
Several western districts cover five to seven counties. Recording is county-level and never district-level.
A Recent Filing Called Absent
Notice attaches under K.S.A. 58-2222 from the time of filing, which can precede indexing and imaging.
A Compiled List Expected
Rule 22(b)(2)(B) forbids the clerk to compile or bulk distribute. Nothing about volume changes that answer.
The Order a Kansas Request Is Built In
Use first, then dates, then counties, then the two doors.
Settle the Use Before the Search
What the material will be used for is fixed in writing at the outset, because in this state a custodian may ask for that in a signed certification and the answer has to be true.
Date the District
The relevant judicial district’s eCourt go-live date is looked up before any case history is read, so that a gap in the record is attributed to the right cause.
Name the Counties
Recording is a county act. Every county in scope is listed, worked and reported individually, and the ones outside scope are named as outside scope.
Separate Portal From Terminal
Findings are marked according to which door produced them, and anything Rule 22 keeps off the portal is described as unexamined rather than as absent.
Who Sends Us Kansas Instructions
Six recurring requests, and the Kansas provision each one meets.
Firms Reading Old Case History
Records that straddle a district’s changeover date
Holders of an Unsatisfied Judgment
Register of deeds filings read county by county
Servers Working a Return
A verified physical address, not merely a mailing point
Estate and Mineral Heirs
Interests recorded in a county nobody in the family lives in
Lenders After Charge-Off
A balance already written down, never a live application
Owners With a Vacated Lease
A former occupant and an unpaid sum, never a screening question
Two Limits, Written Against Kansas Provisions
Each one is drawn where a Kansas provision already draws it.
The certification means what it says
K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2) asks a requester to promise, in writing, that a list of names and addresses from a public record will not be turned into a sales list. We sign that where it is asked for and we hold to it: nothing obtained on a Kansas file is marketed from, sold on, or handed to anybody who would market from it. The same discipline governs how a record is obtained in the first place. What sits inside a bank or brokerage account is neither collected nor reported by this practice; reaching it takes a subpoena or a court order, applied for by your attorney. The lawful basis for a Kansas request is recorded before the request goes out.
Not a consumer reporting agency, and this is not a screening file
Lenders and property owners are in the grid above, so the boundary belongs in plain sight. This practice is not a consumer reporting agency, has never held that status, and a Kansas research file is not a consumer report. That closes four uses of it outright, while we hold it and after you do: letting somebody a tenancy, employing or promoting them, extending credit, and underwriting insurance. Tenant screening and pre-employment screening requests arrive regularly, and both are refused. Those decisions were placed by Congress behind a regulated product with adverse-action obligations and a dispute route for the person it describes, and that is a product this firm does not sell. Kansas landlords and lenders reach us at the far end of the sequence, once the tenancy has ended or the loan has been charged off. Where somebody is presently applying to you, a screening provider is the correct referral and it is the one you will get.
Declined Requests, and the Rule Kansas Wrote First
Three of Rule 22’s eleven excluded case types are protective-order proceedings. That is the state answering the question.
Before any argument about policy, look at what Kansas has already decided. Rule 22(c) keeps three whole categories of case off the public portal: protection from abuse cases under K.S.A. 60-3101 et seq., protection from stalking, sexual assault or human trafficking cases under K.S.A. 60-31a01 et seq., and cases under the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act at K.S.A. 60-31b01 et seq. A court system that removes those three from public browsing has stated its view of whether they should be browsable.
So those requests are declined here. Where the object is the current whereabouts of a former partner, of a person who has petitioned a Kansas court for protection, of somebody enrolled in a programme built for people escaping abuse, or of anyone whose distance from the requester appears to be a decision rather than an accident, the answer is no – to the request as framed, to a reduced version of it, and to referring it onward to a firm that would accept it. The wording it arrives in does not change the answer, and neither does the relationship described. A page that has spent several thousand words on how Kansas records can be worked owes the reader an equally clear account of what it will not work them for.
Safe at Home, and where it now lives
Kansas runs an address confidentiality programme under K.S.A. 75-451 to 75-458. It is worth being current about who administers it, because a great deal of published guidance is not: the functions were moved to the attorney general, and the amendment history printed against K.S.A. 75-453 records the 2021 session law that did it. Several features are unusual enough to matter operationally:
- You cannot apply directly. Section 75-453(a) requires the application to be made “by and through an enrolling agent” and states in terms that participants “shall not apply directly to the attorney general”. Applicant and enrolling agent both sign under penalty of perjury.
- The attorney general becomes the agent both for service of process and for receipt of mail, under 75-453(a)(2), and forwards all first class mail under 75-455(c).
- Certification lasts four years under 75-453(c), unless withdrawn or invalidated, with renewal by regulation.
- Agencies must accept the designated address when creating, amending or updating a public record under 75-455(a), unless the attorney general has determined that the agency has a bona fide statutory or administrative need for the real address and will use it only for that.
- And there is a notification duty that surprises people. Where the application discloses existing or active child support, custody or visitation orders, section 75-453(d) requires the attorney general, within ten days of certification, to notify the other parent of the designated address and of the agency designation, by mail with return receipt requested to that parent’s last known address, with a copy to counsel of record.
That last provision is the reason this section is written in this order. Kansas built the protection and then wrote a channel through it for the other parent in a custody matter. It is not our channel, and we do not treat it as an opening; it is the state’s way of reconciling one court’s orders with another statute’s confidentiality, and it is administered by the attorney general rather than by anybody who could be persuaded.
If you are the person somebody may be looking for
We are the wrong firm to ask, and telling you so is worth more than selling you anything. Safe at Home is entered through an enrolling agent – a victim services organisation or similar body – rather than by writing to the state directly, and a local advocate can help with both the application and the parts of the problem the application does not solve. Questions about what a Kansas file discloses belong to the district court that holds it. Safety planning is outside our competence and we will not pretend otherwise. Read nothing here as advice on shielding your own address – it is an account of how Kansas arranges public records, written for people asking permitted questions about them.
Service of process is the case we do take
None of this closes the door on work adjacent to families. Where a server arrives with a Kansas case number, a named party and an attorney standing behind the instruction, the task is one a court has already set in motion, and locating the party is the outcome the court is waiting on. The distinction applied here is between a purpose a third party could check against a court file and a purpose whose only object is to reverse somebody’s decision to be further away. That question is asked and answered in writing before a Kansas file opens. Where the real issue underneath is how much time a claim has left, that belongs with our note on the Kansas debt collection statute of limitations.
What a Kansas Report Puts in Writing
Every finding carries the office and the county that produced it, so the same document can be retrieved again without us. Case findings are marked according to which of Rule 22’s two doors produced them, and anything the rule keeps off the portal is described as unexamined rather than as nothing found. The relevant judicial district’s changeover date is stated where a case history crosses it. Counties left unsearched are listed as unsearched. Nothing enters the file except public record and licensed data, no Kansas search starts before its lawful basis is written down, and no name from a Kansas file is ever used to sell anything to anybody. Those have been the terms this practice has worked to since 2004.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to use names and addresses from Kansas public records?
It depends entirely on the use. K.S.A. 45-230 makes it unlawful to knowingly sell, give or receive any list of names and addresses contained in or derived from public records for the purpose of selling or offering to sell property or a service to the people listed. Seven exceptions are written into the section, covering division of vehicles lists, professional licensee lists, examination applicant lists, voter registration lists used solely for campaign or election purposes, postsecondary institution lists shared with qualifying affiliates, Secretary of State lists under the Uniform Commercial Code search provision, and anything otherwise authorised by law. A knowing violation carries a civil penalty set by the court for each violation, in an action brought by the attorney general or a county or district attorney.
Why is a Kansas divorce case showing no documents?
Because Supreme Court Rule 22(d) puts them off the portal. Subsection (d)(5) excludes any document filed in a dissolution of marriage case under the Kansas Family Law Code, (d)(1) excludes any document filed in a child custody, visitation and support proceeding, and (d)(9) does the same for parentage cases. Fifteen document categories are listed in all. The case itself may appear; its filings do not. Rule 22(a) notes that material kept off the portal may still be accessible by other means, such as at a courthouse terminal, and Rule 22(b)(2)(A) requires each district court to maintain one.
Which Kansas cases never appear on the public portal at all?
Rule 22(c) lists eleven case types: adoptions, care and treatment proceedings for mentally ill persons and for persons with an alcohol or substance abuse problem, child in need of care cases, coroner inquests, expunged cases, grand jury proceedings, inquisitions, parental bypass proceedings, protection from abuse cases under K.S.A. 60-3101 et seq., protection from stalking, sexual assault or human trafficking cases under K.S.A. 60-31a01 et seq., and cases under the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, K.S.A. 60-31b01 et seq. Rule 22(a) is explicit that nonpublic case records are available neither on the portal nor at a courthouse terminal.
When did Kansas courts move to the new case management system?
Over five years and eight go-live dates. The Judicial Branch publishes the schedule: the 8th and 21st judicial districts on 5 August 2019; the 4th, 6th, 11th, 14th, 19th and 31st on 2 November 2020; the 13th on 1 November 2021; nine districts on 11 July 2022 and eight more on 12 September 2022; the 3rd, 7th and 29th on 3 April 2023; the 18th on 7 August 2023; the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals on 17 June 2024; and the 10th, Johnson County, on 5 November 2024. Counting the district entries gives all thirty-one. The Judicial Branch states that whether a court is on eCourt affects which court’s information can be searched on the public access portal.
Can a Kansas clerk run a multi-case search for me?
No. Rule 22(b)(2)(B) states that a clerk will not compile information or provide bulk distribution of information under Rule 106B(e). It is a prohibition rather than a question of capacity, so offering to pay or to wait does not change the answer. Rule 22(b)(2)(C) routes requests for documents through the Kansas Open Records Act, K.S.A. 45-215 et seq., which is where the certification under K.S.A. 45-220(c) and the use restriction in K.S.A. 45-230 come back into play at the counter.
Who keeps deeds in Kansas, and when does a recording take effect?
Each of the 105 counties elects a register of deeds. K.S.A. 19-1201 provides for a four-year term beginning with the 1976 general election and requires a corporate surety bond of not less than ten thousand dollars filed with the county clerk, conditioned on faithful performance and on delivering all office property to a successor. K.S.A. 58-2222 supplies the timing: a certified and recorded instrument imparts notice to all persons of its contents from the time of filing with the register of deeds, and subsequent purchasers and mortgagees are deemed to purchase with notice. Notice therefore attaches at filing, which can be well before the document appears in an online image set.
Does Kansas have an address confidentiality program?
Yes, under K.S.A. 75-451 to 75-458, and it is administered by the attorney general rather than the secretary of state – the functions were transferred by a 2021 session law recorded in the amendment history of the statute. Applications are made only through an enrolling agent; section 75-453(a) states that participants shall not apply directly to the attorney general. Certification runs four years under 75-453(c). The attorney general acts as agent for service of process and for receipt of mail and forwards all first class mail, and under 75-455(a) agencies must accept the designated address when creating or updating a record unless a bona fide statutory or administrative need for the real address has been determined.
Will you locate someone who has a Kansas protection order?
No. Kansas removed three whole categories of case from its public portal – protection from abuse under K.S.A. 60-3101 et seq., protection from stalking, sexual assault or human trafficking under K.S.A. 60-31a01 et seq., and interstate enforcement of domestic violence protection orders under K.S.A. 60-31b01 et seq. We are not going to be the route around that decision. A request that reads as an attempt to reach a former partner, a protective-order petitioner, or anyone who has moved deliberately out of somebody’s reach is declined here whatever wording it arrives in. Service of process is the separate case: a Kansas case number, a named party and an attorney behind the instruction describe a task a court has already begun, and that work we take.
Open a Kansas File
Send the name, any address history you hold even if it is only a county, and what the research is for – that last one is not a formality in this state. We will fix the counties in scope before searching, date the relevant judicial district against the eCourt schedule before reading any case history, mark each finding by which of Rule 22’s two doors produced it, and list the counties we did not reach. With enough to begin on, a first written read is usually back with you within 24 hours. Prefer to test the question before opening a file? Get in touch and we will say honestly whether Kansas records are likely to answer it.
Start Your Request →
